[12:58:06] 10Countervandalism-Network, 06Content-Transform-Team, 10Wiki-Setup, 13Patch-For-Review: Post-creation work for idwikivoyage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T381080#10437035 (10MSantos) Hey, we have noticed that parsoid is not enabled by default for idwikivoyage and I'm wondering if there are any doubts... [13:34:09] 10Countervandalism-Network, 06Content-Transform-Team, 10Wiki-Setup, 13Patch-For-Review: Post-creation work for idwikivoyage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T381080#10437123 (10Anoop) >>! In T381080#10437035, @MSantos wrote: > Hey, we have noticed that parsoid is not enabled by default for idwikivoyage... [14:40:56] 10Countervandalism-Network, 06Content-Transform-Team, 10Wiki-Setup, 13Patch-For-Review: Post-creation work for idwikivoyage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T381080#10437346 (10jhsoby) >>! In T381080#10437123, @Anoop wrote: > parsoid is activated see https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/mediawiki... [15:16:06] 10Countervandalism-Network, 06Content-Transform-Team, 10Wiki-Setup, 13Patch-For-Review: Post-creation work for idwikivoyage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T381080#10437436 (10Anoop) >>! In T381080#10437346, @jhsoby wrote: >>>! In T381080#10437123, @Anoop wrote: >> parsoid is activated see https://gerr... [18:32:10] Byteme: Thanks, I did some clean up and copy editing. [18:40:56] 10Countervandalism-Network, 06Content-Transform-Team, 10Wiki-Setup, 13Patch-For-Review: Post-creation work for idwikivoyage - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T381080#10438262 (10MSantos) I see the confusion, the link is an example to be followed. Maybe we can make it clear on the checklist if that helps. [19:12:07] 10CVNBot: Protect event wrongly parses protection flags as part article name - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T327133#10438389 (10Krinkle) @Wargo Would you like to try writing a patch for this? [22:38:00] 10CVNBot: Protect event wrongly parses protection flags as part article name - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T327133#10439080 (10Wargo) >>! In T327133#10438389, @Krinkle wrote: > @Wargo Would you like to try writing a patch for this? I think it can be regex change. They are in user generated XMLs, right?