[15:07:29] Hello! I am uncertain that this is the correct place to ask this question, but has there been any discussion on the creation of a tool that can detect potential fake/inaccurate representations of sources via crawling and some simple AI analysis? If not I figure it might be an interesting thing for me to research. [15:31:34] Hi everyone, I'm new to counter-vandalism on Wikipedia and I've just begun and have enjoyed making contributions against vandalism and patrolling recent changes in general. I'd like to ask if there are any resources which could be used to find vandalism besides the #cvn-wp-en channel which I'm using at the moment with Twinkle to revert vandalism. [15:31:35] Advice appreciated! [17:26:32] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit [17:26:47] I know Athar left, but for future reference :) [18:30:41] !staff Would this be considered vandalism: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1286254703&oldid=1274779015 ? [18:30:42] Thanks Atharva210, staff have been notified of your request and should be around shortly to assist you. [19:38:18] If only people stayed connected long enough.. [19:38:44] The above is not vandalism, the source does not back up that claim, it seems made up to make him look bad. [19:38:56] The source has been there since 2008 and says nothing of the sort. [19:38:58] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=909033983&oldid=903865356&title=Henrik_Lundqvist [19:39:08] This vandalised the claim and the above removes it [19:39:32] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henrik_Lundqvist&diff=prev&oldid=916766352 [19:39:44] although it removes too much because they didn't know what was there before, typical [19:50:43] The other one I've reverted: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_of_Mature_American_Citizens&diff=prev&oldid=1286266160 [19:50:54] The henrik edit was from the same IP [19:51:02] perhaps not the same actor