[20:53:31] <enterprisey>	 I'd like to authoritatively determine which parameter combinations are valid for action=edit. Roughly where in the MediaWiki source code is the logic for checking action=edit parameters?
[21:42:55] <legoktm[m]>	 <enterprisey "I'd like to authoritatively dete"> Have you read https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Parameters_to_index.php#Edit_and_submit? 
[21:43:19] <legoktm[m]>	 Trying to go through the EditPage code will...hurt your eyes and be near impossible to trace
[21:44:24] <legoktm[m]>	 There are some extension parameters like TemplateSandbox which aren't documented there though
[21:56:27] <enterprisey>	 I expected as much, thanks for the link
[22:13:22] <legoktm[m]>	 But if you have specific questions we can answer them here too :)
[22:22:21] <enterprisey>	 Well, I'm making a Rust API client library with the goal of making illegal parameter combinations unrepresentable using enums
[22:22:22] <enterprisey>	 I decided to start with Edit
[22:24:01] <enterprisey>	 So I have an enum for "edit kind" (ReplaceText, Prepend, Append, PrependAndAppend, Undo, UndoAfter) and "edit target" (Title, PageId)
[22:26:43] <enterprisey>	 But I'm not 100% sure how those interact with the section parameter, or with the "redirect-appendonly" error ("You have attempted to edit using the redirect-following mode, which must be used in conjunction with section=new, prependtext, or appendtext. ")
[22:26:48] <legoktm[m]>	 enterprisey Wait,  I should've asked, is this for index.php (humans)? Or api.php?
[22:26:52] <enterprisey>	 api.php
[22:27:13] <legoktm[m]>	 Oops, then the autogenerated docs are the best, ignore the earlier link 
[22:27:54] <legoktm[m]>	 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?modules=edit
[22:27:59] <enterprisey>	 I could of course try all the combinations myself, but I decided I'd be lazy and ask here for starters :)
[22:28:57] <legoktm[m]>	 https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/plugins/gitiles/mediawiki/core/+/refs/heads/master/includes/api/ApiEditPage.php actually shouldn't be *too * hard to follow for logic that's in the API module 
[22:46:40] <enterprisey>	 Indeed, that's not too bad at all. Thanks