[10:12:13] Reedy: I've been using 1.39.1 for this upgrade attempt [12:07:51] amiconn: at least one postgres bug fix (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T326039) has gone in since 1.39.1 was cut [12:23:34] marks: Looks like this bug *almost* fixes one of our two upgrade problems [12:29:47] It sets defaults for user_name, user_token, user_real_name, user_email, user_newpassword, user_password [12:30:02] The same problem also exists for user_touched [12:30:23] Then there's a problem with indexes of table "templatelinks" [12:30:44] And the upgrade resets (or changes?) MediaWiki:Sidebar [12:37:01] did you edit MediaWiki:Sidebar ? [12:37:16] if you were using the default one, the default might have changed [12:37:32] but not if you had a custom one [12:46:16] amiconn: interesting, I didn’t have any issues with user_touched when I upgraded… [12:52:18] Hello [12:52:19] I want to contribute to wikimedia open source and looking for issues [12:52:19] can anyone suggest me some issues or where can i find issues? [12:52:20] I am pretty good in javascript related techs and a full stack web developer [12:52:20] Have worked on python,django as well [12:56:03] !phab [12:56:03] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/ [12:57:35] hey thanks [13:12:07] !hacker | Nikhil61 [13:12:07] Nikhil61: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/How_to_become_a_MediaWiki_hacker [13:58:40] Platonides: Yes we edited it (this is an old installation which has been upgraded several times already). With the upgrade from 1.35.8 to 1.39.1 it's reset to default (including a wrong link to our main page (which is called "Startseite" - the German default seems to be "Hauptseite") [14:07:53] Pages missing and it's falling back to default translations? [14:34:37] amiconn did you run update.php ? [14:34:50] yes of course [14:35:42] That was where I ran into all sorts of PostgreSQL errors (which I fixed by manually editing tables) [17:28:21] Can someone please submit https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/ProtectSite/+/831620 ? It hasn't been automatically even though C+2 given. (or re-C+2 it maybe?) [17:46:57] let's see [17:49:14] CosmicAlpha: since the first gate-and-submits failed, it's intentional that it needs a new +2 vote to re-try that. did that, so this time if gate-and-submit succeeds it should submit the patch [17:59:46] taavi: thanks!