[00:21:28] [discord] I'd say he's a walking disaster. [00:32:03] i believe that’s a bit harsh [00:32:13] hes having some trouble, but we don’t need to write anyone off [00:32:23] people can change [00:39:34] [discord] Look at Bukkit for example [00:40:30] [discord] He was a vandal, violated the user account policy, and now he (was) a wiki creator and a interwiki admin [00:46:48] [discord] Bukkit wasn't exactly a vandal. He was CIR by age but never went to the extremes Bluba did [00:48:56] [discord] True [01:51:34] [discord] Bukkit wasn't a walking disaster like Bluba is for an example. Sure, Bukkit did some really shitty things, but that's nothing compared to the shit that the former has done recently. [02:45:34] people can change [02:45:46] given personal experience, i like to give people the benefit of the doubt [15:31:45] I am concerned [[User:Gani]] may be a sockpuppet [15:31:46] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Gani [15:32:16] I don't have any proof or evidence at this time, only a suspicion, but I would take a look at their recent edits on TestWiki [15:32:52] 4 edits, 3 on TW:RfP (they were also granted the 'crat bit before reaching 10 edits), and 1 on their userpage to add user boxes [15:33:08] maybe it's just me, but I find their activity suspicious [16:01:53] BrandonWM: my gut tells me you might be right [16:01:57] I'm looking at stuff [16:04:18] [discord] Stewards: see me before acting on ^ [16:07:42] RhinosF1: Thanks! Should we remove the bureaucrat bit from the user in the meantime since they never should've been granted it anyway? [16:07:58] BrandonWM: whose we [16:08:14] testwiki crats/consuls? [16:08:29] [discord] Crats can't de eat [16:08:36] [discord] Crats can't decrat (edited) [16:09:10] oh yeah [16:09:12] nvm [16:09:14] consuls? [16:13:18] Yes [16:14:21] cool thanks [16:15:27] [discord] Locked [16:15:48] Thanks Agent [16:16:01] simple cross-wiki abuse or LTA? [16:16:23] LTA would suggest abuse of multiple accounts [16:17:32] LTA [16:19:53] ah okay [21:52:14] [discord] If that was the case, then a CU would've been conducted. [22:58:45] what do you mean