[00:51:18] [discord] @CVT Melba Fiona sent an RfP on TestWiki [00:51:44] [discord] AIPaD declined but if @Agent needed edits made, there is that. [00:52:00] [discord] CC: @DarkMatterMan4500 since he originally brought it up [00:52:58] [discord] AIPaD declined but if @Agent needed edits made for a CU, there is that. (edited) [00:53:13] [discord] They are blocked already blocked locally [00:53:17] [discord] AIPaD declined but if Agent@Agent needed edits made for a CU, there is that. (edited) [00:53:29] [discord] yeah AIPaD blocked [00:53:38] [discord] but i mean a global lock if possible [00:59:31] [discord] Well yeah, considering the name similarities such as Melba Merrystar and Melba Insieme. [00:59:53] [discord] yeah [01:00:02] [discord] so they’re indef blocked on testwiki [01:00:20] [discord] if a steward is around could they CU and lock upon confirmation? [01:01:40] [discord] Yeah, I think we get the point here. [14:43:11] [discord] does apex have consistent IPs you can reverse lookup? This should be a reliable method to 'sniff out' in some cases even when you are not confident there is enough to CU directly [14:43:39] [discord] I think there were a couple IPs apex reliably went through but I'm too rusty to recall particulars to suggest (not publicly of course) [14:44:15] [discord] I think she is using similar ISPs but not IPs [14:44:20] [discord] hmm [14:44:39] [discord] I'm also foggy if apex was one of those who would register with one IP and edit with a dead ringer [14:44:45] [discord] I don't think so in her case [14:45:11] [discord] I dont think so