[02:17:58] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <raidarr> ok, so someone is connecting from a school to do this
[02:18:10] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <raidarr> may be worth running checks on and flushing out as a global brigand then
[02:18:20] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <raidarr> from a school among other places I imagine
[02:18:42] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <raidarr> I think it would be preferable to take care of the origin of the problem if it's the same individual coming again and again rather than protection creep
[05:17:10] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> yes
[05:17:45] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> https://meta.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Gazetteer_of_wikis&action=history more of this
[05:17:50] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> like still ongoing
[05:21:55] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> partial block from only gazetteer of wikis:
[05:21:56] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> ```
[05:21:57] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> 167.88.0.0/16
[05:21:59] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> 188.25.0.0/16
[05:22:00] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> ```
[05:22:01] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> lock:
[05:22:03] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> ```
[05:22:04] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> Maevender
[05:22:05] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> ```
[05:22:06] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> could also lock a large list of now inactive vandalism only accounts from the gazetteer of wikis page history but seems like a waste of time
[05:22:16] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Agent> I protected the Gazetteer of wikis against non-autoconfirmed users
[05:22:22] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> alright
[05:22:24] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <Colleiflower> sounds good ig
[09:36:35] <CosmicAlpha>	 @Agent not sure protecting if is a good idea? Users not active on Meta, might want to add their wiki there, meaning they would now have to become autoconfirmed on Meta to do so. I see a use case for non-autoconfirmed users to edit that page.
[13:32:35] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <raidarr> prefer not to hit /16 unless strictly necessary
[13:32:57] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <raidarr> and yeah, I'm reluctant with protecting the gazetteer especially to full ac
[13:33:02] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <raidarr> to users might be fine
[13:33:29] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <raidarr> alternatively we proceed with the initiative to drop it entirely since that page is an unmaintained mess that just soaks time
[16:14:41] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <BWM> tbh I agree with this
[16:15:02] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <BWM> the page is a true mess and honestly, no one really uses it anyways
[16:15:19] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <BWM> in the sense that people use it when looking up wikis
[16:40:36] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <NotAracham> It's a good idea, except ~half the wikis listed are closed or deleted.  Not especially curated. 😦
[16:41:43] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <BWM> i'll go through it
[16:41:51] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <BWM> still painful
[16:43:02] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <BWM> actually no i'm not i don't have that sort of time
[16:44:19] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <BWM> can someone though
[16:44:29] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <BWM> if not i'll do it tonight or something
[18:17:28] <mhbridgebot>	 [discord] <NotAracham> Returning to the topic of protection levels, users would make sense.  IP edits are silly for something where the person adding a wiki should realistically have a relationship to the wiki added.
[19:17:21] <Voidwalker>	 $log test
[19:17:23] <Void-bot>	 Failed to save item!
[20:57:14] <Voidwalker>	 $log test
[20:57:23] <Void-bot>	 Saved item "test"