[00:22:39] <MirahezeRelay>	 <Fiddlestix#9401> potential username policy vio? [[User:RandomRetard2137]]
[00:22:39] <wm-bot>	 https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:RandomRetard2137
[00:22:40] <MirahezeRelay>	 <Wiki-Bot#2998> <https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:RandomRetard2137>
[14:08:50] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr#6550> I'm not sure I'd hit it myself since I set some pretty high bars for intervening, but if someone does want to they would be justified
[17:26:51] <MirahezeRelay>	 <NotAracham#0009> Yeah, it's very much on the cusp...
[18:59:18] <MirahezeRelay>	 <BWM#6978> if i was a GS, I personally would
[18:59:22] <MirahezeRelay>	 <BWM#6978> it’s high enough
[19:45:00] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr#6550> cc @Reception123 for 2c on ^
[19:45:32] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr#6550> I don't tend to be ideal because I set a rather high and sometimes admittedly not the most consistent bar for when I'd want to intervene
[19:46:43] <MirahezeRelay>	 <Reception123#2349> They are an established user so I would rule out an outright lock, also because there's no evidence of bad faith
[19:46:56] <MirahezeRelay>	 <Reception123#2349> A warning that we could consider
[19:51:25] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr#6550> if action was taken I'd definitely have it be a 'please change this' deal