[00:29:24] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bwm0, replying to agentisai> Will bring up w/ the team
[00:29:34] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bwm0> Not sure when/how it was approved but fully agree it shouldn't have been
[00:31:11] <MirahezeRelay>	 <pixldev, replying to bwm0> If I may ask, what’s the ID for the request?
[00:31:19] <MirahezeRelay>	 <pixldev> out of curiosity
[00:32:15] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bwm0, replying to pixldev> I'm looking as we speak
[00:34:20] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bwm0> @pixldev 38653
[01:33:04] <MirahezeRelay>	 <jph2, replying to bwm0> i don't see the issue with the wiki request. maybe not perfect, but reasonably clear.
[01:33:40] <MirahezeRelay>	 <jph2> it should be noted the same person who approved the wiki also identified the issue with the wiki.
[01:34:33] <MirahezeRelay>	 <jph2> meaning a wiki approval might be made in good faith, but there's no way to know if a wiki will adhere to Content Policy until it proves it does
[07:54:36] <MirahezeRelay>	 <max20091> Bot account: https://issue-tracker.miraheze.org/p/EVELYN2416/
[07:55:12] <MirahezeRelay>	 <max20091> ^I mean spam
[11:20:25] <MirahezeRelay>	 <kiju1108, replying to max20091> ^ @Site Reliability Engineers
[11:21:53] <MirahezeRelay>	 <kiju1108> Locked on-wiki
[11:22:13] <MirahezeRelay>	 <kiju1108> + Locked on-wiki
[11:38:29] <MirahezeRelay>	 <reception123> disabled