[09:59:04] [1/3] Question: [09:59:05] [2/3] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Xxiarc This is clearly self-promotion, but not for commercial purposes as far as I can tell. [09:59:05] [3/3] Is that allowed? [10:00:10] A bit more grey [23:01:18] [1/2] Does [[User:Media]] fall in the same category as [[User:Notice]]? [23:01:18] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Media https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Notice [23:01:19] [2/2] Media does have several meanings too (data carriers such as CD's and broadcasters, news outlets, etc) [23:01:19]

[1/2] [23:01:19]

[2/2] [23:01:52] I would say so [23:02:27] okidoki 🙂 [23:02:33] thanks [23:16:30] as far as that stuff is concerned, names are much more relaxed than say, assessing the genericness of a wiki name [23:16:50] a username can be completely generic, overlap etc so long as it does not directly imply miraheze affiliation and that is a relatively narrow category [23:20:19] Just trying to understand where the line is drawn. Like if it is too close to be appearing official to Miraheze [23:23:51] I mean... Project, news, support, information, library, archive. When I see a name, I think: "can it be misunderstood?" [23:31:17] In the case of a farm with an incredibly broad range of projects, there are too many contexts in which odd names could make sense, or where being restrictive on permitted naming becomes nannying, or where confusion goes both ways and sometimes if people get confused they just need to open their mind to other possibilities [23:32:44] [1/2] I'd consider 'support' to be a somewhat edge name although it still would not sufficiently make an implication I would strike under username policy unless the context of the account exploited that name to imply official status, which would be a no no, or it was something like 'miraheze support', which definitely would be a problem. Though there is arguable circumstance even for a nam [23:32:44] [2/2] e 'wikifarm support' in the case of say, a project which covers wiki farms.