[13:42:02] <MirahezeRelay>	 <johnnycoolmn87> discordapp.com/invite/crCmayNDhr @everyone
[13:42:02] <MirahezeRelay>	 <Dyno#3861> @johnnycoolmn87 No invite links.
[16:03:24] <MirahezeRelay>	 <traderwatts1237> [1/3] I’m looking to help the first 10 people interested on how to  start earning $100k or more within a week, but you will reimburse me 10% of your profits when you receive it. Note: only interested people should send a friend request or send me a dm! ask me (HOW) via Telegram username 👇
[16:03:25] <MirahezeRelay>	 <traderwatts1237> [2/3] @Officialsteven247
[16:03:25] <MirahezeRelay>	 <traderwatts1237> [3/3] Or The Telegram Link in my bio
[16:03:44] <MirahezeRelay>	 <tali64, replying to traderwatts1237> @Discord Moderators
[16:04:06] <MirahezeRelay>	 <reception123> :BanHammerMH:
[22:30:12] <MirahezeRelay>	 <rodejong> https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Northportwiki?oldid=487255
[22:30:32] <MirahezeRelay>	 <rodejong> He blanked the page, but perhaps better to delete it completely
[22:31:27] <MirahezeRelay>	 <tali64, replying to rodejong> [1/2] This is a @Meta Administrators issue and not a CVT issue
[22:31:28] <MirahezeRelay>	 <tali64, replying to rodejong> [2/2] -# I wish Global Admins were just Meta admins by default
[22:36:07] <MirahezeRelay>	 <serverlessharej> Aren't global admins Meta admins by implication? Meta is one of the wikis
[22:36:18] <MirahezeRelay>	 <serverlessharej> Or are global admins expected to be "hands off" admins
[22:37:31] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign, replying to rodejong> [1/2] I think the original is fine since it just links to a news article related to the wiki this user just requested.
[22:37:32] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign, replying to rodejong> [2/2] Now that the page is blanked, I wouldn't be too worried about it.
[22:38:22] <MirahezeRelay>	 <rodejong> okay, was in doubt, Thanks for clearin it up
[22:38:32] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign> Never mind, the website is on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_miscellaneous_fake_news_websites
[22:40:11] <MirahezeRelay>	 <tali64, replying to serverlessharej> [1/2] The status quo I think is that Global Admins are not automatically Meta admins - most Global Admins are indeed Meta admins, but only because they ran for Meta admin and were successful, not because they were simply a Global Admin; your draft RfC on global admin rights may be a good place to clarify the issue, or a Steward determination could settle it on t
[22:40:11] <MirahezeRelay>	 <tali64, replying to serverlessharej> [2/2] he spot
[22:40:59] <MirahezeRelay>	 <serverlessharej> Seems silly to me that global admins wouldn't be able to do their work on Meta, like it's somehow the exception. That's a good idea, I'll propose that
[22:41:17] <MirahezeRelay>	 <serverlessharej> I am guessing this is some tribal feud between meta admins and global admins several years ago
[22:50:10] <MirahezeRelay>	 <pixldev, replying to serverlessharej> GAs currently are welcome to action on meta to the same standards as any wiki
[22:50:41] <MirahezeRelay>	 <pixldev> Preferably leave things to local staff, but you’re free to delete vandalism if no one’s on within 2 minutes
[22:50:56] <MirahezeRelay>	 <pixldev> Local requests gets complicated
[23:00:41] <MirahezeRelay>	 <rodejong> [1/2] That has to be cleared up per RfF/RfC I guess.
[23:00:41] <MirahezeRelay>	 <rodejong> [2/2] I guess that the GA cannot do the tasks from the Admin Noticeboard, But deleting violating Userpages/subpages etc. wouldn't be a problem.
[23:24:38] <MirahezeRelay>	 <serverlessharej> @tali64 do you think Proposal 1B https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Requests_for_Comment/Delegation_of_Steward_rights#Proposal_1B:_Additional_rights_for_Global_Administrators should have a separate proposal split off for user account/username-related rights? Could you see someone supporting one but opposing the other?
[23:25:44] <MirahezeRelay>	 <tali64, replying to serverlessharej> Not particularly - just out of curiosity, when do you expect the RfC to be ready for voting?
[23:26:16] <MirahezeRelay>	 <serverlessharej> Probably after a week of no editing activity. Hope to hear from others in the meantime
[23:45:58] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr, replying to serverlessharej> it is a legacy element from a time cvt was a less trusted capacity and exclusion of certain wikis from cvt actor (never steward) scope was a recognized function
[23:53:04] <MirahezeRelay>	 <serverlessharej> Global Admins being a part of CVT
[23:53:25] <MirahezeRelay>	 <serverlessharej> Sort of, custodians of last resort