[08:38:10] @CVT https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/TsanChanComThemPho [12:13:10] [1/2] erm... am I just meant to ignore these or is there some way to get these out of the unpatrolled RecentChanges? I already tried mass rollback but they also reverted all their changes so rollback doesn't apply [12:13:10] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/443926951292567562/1445024927357993071/image.png?ex=692ed7d5&is=692d8655&hm=b1b0f3501b99ca6550c4b8ed9cd9438194e47e272889d73ba9edc42687d34688& [12:32:55] just click patrolled [12:33:11] and then assign autopatrolled to the users [12:36:40] diff > mark as patrolled [12:37:32] they're there to make it easy to check if people are making good edits. if you trust the people making these edits, just assign them autopatrolled so it doesn't trigger this [12:44:25] If you mean giving autopatrolled to the user that make the edits, 1) that can only be done by Stewards or Meta admins, which WWR is neither, and 2) the user is an LTA that has already been globally banned; patrolling the edits still can be done [12:44:50] oh sorry i didn't realize this was on meta [12:58:38] Giving a LTA any additional rights is a dumb idea tbh. [13:00:37] yeah i did not realize this was an LTA. sorry should've scrolled up. it does feel a bit weird that their edits do still have to be patrolled after they're banned though [13:01:00] That's just how MediaWiki works [13:16:02] well usually that's because you either rollback or delete their edits; I can't rollback their edits because they already reverted them, and I can't delete their edits because I'm not an admin [13:19:43] I think summaries like https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Restricted_changes?diff=prev&oldid=504838 are a cause for revision deletion though? [13:20:54] Quite possibly [13:38:10] oof there's a lot of these weird edit summaries... did they really edit and revert just to leave all these?? why?? [13:39:15] Because edit summaries cannot be reverted by regular users - they can only be deleted by an administrator, either by deleting the revision summary or by deleting the whole page and only restoring the non-vandal revisions [16:09:36] Are you getting a lot of LTAs? [16:10:06] Miraheze always gets lots of LTAs [21:01:38] We have one particular LTA who is extremely annoying [21:03:27] They are specifically vindictive towards mediawiki users likes to state what they think of said user, and vandalise a lot of pages on several wikis. [21:04:48] Oh, they like many wiki sites [21:05:19] minecraft.wiki has like 4 active LTAs too, which for a single topic wiki family feels like a lot [21:07:17] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Sigmar_Unberogen [21:07:30] Speaking of LTA [21:08:05] oh, this is actually interesting [21:08:32] @notaracham I think that is an LTA (See their reference to [[w:en:WP:WIKINGER]]) [21:08:32] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:WP:WIKINGER [21:08:33]

[21:08:53] Way ahead of you [21:09:03] Ah, thanks [21:11:22] <_arawynn> wow, that person has some serious Nazi-paroles as the edit summaries [21:11:48] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Wikinger [21:12:05] I wouldn't put it past them to be pretending to be that LTA tbh [21:12:23] He has his own Wikipedia page 🤬 [21:13:20] Either way, pulling some dumb shit worthy of immediate ejection, regardless of who it is [21:13:31] yeah, for sure [21:16:12] Would be nice with hiding these revisions. I hate that comment in my user history [21:17:29] He adds and deletes his edits so they stay in the history. Rollbacking is useless. [21:17:59] Sure, I'll do it as a courtesy for your [23:24:02] [1/2] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:B4V_Esports [23:24:02] [2/2] Does this count as advertising? they also requested a wiki for it https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:RequestWikiQueue/70432 [23:25:05] If there wasn't a wiki requested and approved, I might've considered it spam [23:25:29] yeah that's what I was thinking [23:25:58] but then again it was approved by the AI, not sure what wiki reviewers think