[02:04:27] @Stewards another sock [02:04:28] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/ゐぎるゐぢ [02:04:46] I already posted the previous one on SR/G [02:05:31] Thanks. I was working on limited time earlier and this LTA is a right bastard to chase on ranges. [02:05:54] I'll try to drop hammers in a few hours [02:10:26] oh wait, it actually is the same account I reported earlier [02:20:00] Pretty sure there's at least one other operating freely [03:12:14] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/性犯ざい者いきりゅみち [03:12:21] another one @notaracham [03:13:36] I think I blocked this one locally [03:13:39] Like 5 minutes ago [03:13:47] Yeah I did [03:13:59] still should be globally locked as this is a known LTA [03:14:03] Yeah [03:14:10] NA just locked it [03:14:14] nice [03:14:58] @elisapoly: I created a page for this Japanese LTA on CVT wiki so feel free to add the previous accounts of it [03:22:48] Done [03:23:03] Thank you [16:33:01] A day like this is bound to come if we make automation tools too accessible, but I don't think there is a good way to weed out the vandals. [16:33:29] Worst case scenario is that we do a permission check or something so that non-autoconfirmed can't use it. [18:52:56] https://patterverse.miraheze.org/wiki/User:2600:4040:A010:A900:B125:1EBE:9F49:A8B9 this local admin said their block was a CVT action [18:59:55] might just be a mistake but [19:08:09] I was the last one to block the IP before the admin changed it to indefinite, but I don't think he checked what CVT actually meant. [19:08:28] Hm [19:08:35] Also I think the vandal came back [19:08:41] On the guy's talk page? [19:09:11] I just reverted it. [19:09:37] Thanks [19:09:53] Maybe open a CU for a rangeblock? [19:11:43] I doubt it's gonna be much, but I'd let a Steward look into this. I might have to advise a bureaucrat to disable IP editing on their wiki given that the user behind it is still harassing both admins to this day, even after they were rangeblocked. [19:12:36] Alright then [22:34:05] well first of all it should be clear that a block narrower than a /64 is next to useless [22:34:13] this came up multiple times on the wiki [22:37:43] besides that I can't really tell what the hell is going on with that wiki [22:37:59] CU is only of value when it is logged in accounts, the value of that seems limited [22:53:30] You were the one who told me not to make such determination with IP ranges in the first place though, no? :/ [23:07:16] I probably did in context of ipv4 especially, but thought I've always been pretty consistent as far as /64 and ipv6 (just nothing more broad than that) [23:07:25] and if that was not abundantly clear then I apologize [23:38:16] Yeah, it clearly wasn't.