[09:39:06] World Sexual Health Day? https://t.co/6txzCHrEYq?amp=1 [09:39:07] [url] https://bit.ly/3mPvniK | t.co [14:18:34] a global event [14:39:55] wow, half of the RC feed on Meta is just oversighted [14:40:24] or rather, suppressed [14:41:48] Just revdel [14:42:15] Annoying little troll that doesn't deserve acknowledgment in a log [15:05:15] Yeah, revdel is for things like this while Oversight is for more serious matters like PII [15:05:36] I would quite happily supoort lock & hide but it needs a steward [15:06:22] Tbh [15:07:04] https://tenor.com/view/angry-anger-pixar-inside-out-aaah-gif-5628546 [15:07:05] [url] Angry Anger GIF - Angry Anger Pixar - Discover & Share GIFs | tenor.com [15:07:22] This is how I'm feeling about this convoluted and revolting troll here. [15:12:01] Probably best to remain calm and not let the troll get to you, after all that's exactly what they want [15:12:15] And yes I know it's harder done than said but still [15:13:03] Sorry about that. I just find this ridiculous troll to be quite annoying. But yes, it is best if I remained calm. [15:13:42] There's no reason to apologise, I meant that as advice to you 🙂 [15:13:55] Yeah, thanks. [15:14:54] How is this troll still bypassing global blocks and locks and still trying to taunt at us? It's like they knew they would be locked sooner or later. [17:30:06] IP lock is irrelevant to a determined and vaguely technical user [17:30:31] The determination is the more interesting detail [17:37:20] Yeah, IPs can't be locked, but they can be globally blocked for a period of time however. [19:24:44] What I mean is that while IPs are not litinfinate, there are enough and through enough means that whack a mole can last a long time and in some cases do collateral damage. [19:43:26] @raidarr How good is locking down a wiki and neeedin a ceertan user group to edit? [19:44:35] If I ever had to self host my unfinishe wiiki, I would lock it own so only appove users can edit, needing the acct name being DMedd to me offsite [20:11:48] Completely achievable, simply remove the permission from the users and * groups and set it up so only the group in question has it, ie, manually confirmed users or whatever name you'd want [20:12:25] But do keep in mind to either give yourself that same group so you can edit or add it to administration groups, since even staff groups inherit the ability to edit from the lowest levels instead of just getting that permission by default [20:46:05] @raidarr Ho good is it as an anti spam mesere? (and anti vandel) [20:46:26] If you're manually verifying, you might say it's one of the best. [20:49:43] I would only allow acess to users that contacted me vi Fiverr or email and block and remove groups from vandels [20:51:14] Agent: What happened to you? [20:52:30] Tintle: I took an extended break from IRC for like a year but I returned afterwards but never found you again [20:52:56] you were doing JW propaganda [20:54:40] Tintle: not that I can remember, no. I just took a break because of the crash of FlexWiki, really felt bad because of that [21:14:00] @raidarr Any flaws my system (yes, hand verfiying is what I would use) has [21:14:46] I cannot say without a better idea of the execution, though I imagine hand verifying might be seen as inefficient. But it is still a practical choice you can make. [21:16:39] Pretty sure bypassig a bot is somewhat easy [21:26:53] @raidarr What do you think of bots to verfy? (or capchas to block bots) [22:25:52] We're well into 'I couldn't say' territory, unfortunately