[06:28:40] ->daily [06:28:40] ✅ You got $580 daily credits. Streak up! Current streak: 28x You won a bonus of $430 for claiming your daily for 5 days in a row or more! (Included on the money shown!) We need your help to keep Mantaro alive! You can get amazing perks and double the daily credits and access to ~>dailycrate! Memberships start at only $2 per month, check out more at https://patreon.com/mantaro. [06:28:42] [url] Kode & Natan is creating MantaroBot | Patreon | patreon.com [06:28:50] ->roll [06:28:50] 🎲 You got 2! [15:18:30] Let's move the discussion here then. [15:22:20] A large part of why I made a meta project page was so people could first discuss and then collaboratively introduce changes to meta, instead of the current conditions where everyone adds what they wish from personal interest exclusively. Contribution is good, but the key is communication and not everyone being on islands [15:22:45] And you're doing a great job with that @Raidarr [15:22:59] s/@Raidarr/@Raidarr. [15:22:59] darkmatterman450 meant to say: And you're doing a great job with that @Raidarr. [15:24:34] @raidarr what do you insist? [15:26:13] So I encourage discussion or at least reaching out to a few people when making sweeping additions. I am not doing a great job because aside from informal and brief chats or private exchanges with 1-2 people, I am acting unilaterally and getting little challenge to my own activities in spite of a project page inviting collaborative input and changes with deep effects. In other words i wish we, contributors to a [15:26:14] greater whole, would collaborate more. [15:27:43] {{Conditional Support}} I also forgot to point out that I created this template the other day. I got that template from Qualitipedia Central (or some may call it, The Qualitipedia Wiki), as shown from here: https://qualitipedia.miraheze.org/wiki/Template:Conditional_Support [15:27:43] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Template:Conditional_Support [15:27:44]

https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Template:Conditional_Support [15:27:45] [url] Template:Conditional Support - Miraheze Meta | meta.miraheze.org [15:27:45] [url] Template:Conditional Support - Qualitipedia | qualitipedia.miraheze.org [15:28:11] Does this template seem to be okay though, if you guys don't mind me asking? [15:28:34] It's an interesting one, looks fair enough [15:28:55] I do agree some of these template imports are a bit unnecessary [15:29:15] Perhaps if a demonstrated need were shown then I'd agree with them being added to Meta [15:29:36] The other bit is wishing both to include and for admins to include themselves in the process of developing meta [15:29:49] I remember when Reception123 left me a message on a specific warning template. [15:30:39] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Alternate_accounts And this page is looking good here too. [15:30:40] [url] Alternate accounts - Miraheze Meta | meta.miraheze.org [15:31:38] I like that it is a collaborative project naturally developing as an essay to hopefully join the documentation [15:32:06] Yes, and it's still in the process of putting everything together. [15:32:34] The reason I wanted to bring in those redirect template was for a better redirect categorisation. I never wish to cause harm or something, plus I was also thinking of bringing in protection templates as the `Module:Protection banner` is currently useless but I'd just let it go. [15:33:48] That page was imported on June 3rd, 2020. Referring to the configuration page. [15:35:21] Yeah, essays are a nice addition though it's too bad we don't have a namespace for essays/policy only like Wikipedia's Wikipedia namespace [15:36:27] and since then it has been useless, and IMO it would make sense if we begin to put things together, categorisation is a part of what should be put together. I mean, what are we categorising? is it not pages? then, if we don't have pages to categorise what are we going to categorise. [15:37:39] Hmmm, that's not a bad idea. [15:38:35] Recursively ensuring they are used and conventionally accepted is also part of the process. [15:39:25] @Agent, we don't really need a namespace for essays, The Category Essays would go a long way, and A navbox could also be created, a navbox that houses all essays separately, all policies separately and guidelines/help separately is what should be done and I also plan on doing that. [15:42:00] ugochimobi: No, we don't at all but I said it'd be nice to have one for essays and policy like Wikipedia's Wikipedia namespace [15:42:26] like `Wikipedia:` and sort? [15:42:35] @raidarr you're not wrong at all, all we need now is a proper plan, you've started a project on your userspace, which is a great idea. [16:12:20] It'd be nice if we had the RfX candidate pages on the subpage of the main RfX page. [16:12:29] It's help us do many thing [16:12:36] s/thing/things [16:12:37] ugochimobi meant to say: It's help us do many things [17:04:02] @Agent At some point, I am inclined to agree that we have an Essay namespace on metawiki [19:39:08] being sick sucks [19:51:23] Bongo-Cat: what's wrong [20:27:20] Puked, a hell ton of chest pain [20:32:33] :( [20:40:51] I'm in favor of the essay namespace; while categories keep them together and can further sort essays by purpose, the namespace prefix is one of the most effective possible ways to distinguish the type of article and promote the concept [20:41:32] Wouldn't mind seeing an example (even in list form) of what an RfX candidate page format would look like in naming, ie, RfX then RfX/Global rights... [20:41:59] About 2 months ago, that happened to me. October 5th was when it occurred. [20:42:13] I do think a full on navbox may be premature at this time though. I'll defer to the puke from here :p [21:18:52] The "project" namespace is already on every wiki. You just need will to use it. [21:20:06] A category looks like a good idea [21:28:05] The Project namespace on Meta is "Meta" [21:29:45] Yes. [21:30:06] Project is named after {sitename} [21:52:15] Meta already has its function as a namespace; the only way essays would entail one of their own is if the namespace was self descriptive. [22:10:30] But wikipedia has the project and the help ns merged with redirections