[03:02:36] <-PM-Polskacafe#8382, replying to Orduin#1491> [1/5] is it? here's a fragment from fandom.com/licensing [03:02:36] <-PM-Polskacafe#8382, replying to Orduin#1491> [2/5] ``` [03:02:37] <-PM-Polskacafe#8382, replying to Orduin#1491> [3/5] As a contributor, you agree that being attributed in any of the following fashions satisfies the attribution requirements of the license applicable to your contribution to a wiki: a) attribution through a hyperlink (where possible) or URL to the article or articles you contributed to, b) attribution through a hyperlink (where possible) or URL to a [03:02:37] <-PM-Polskacafe#8382, replying to Orduin#1491> [4/5] n alternative, stable online copy which is freely accessible, which conforms with the license, and which provides credit to the authors in a manner equivalent to the credit given on this website, or c) attribution through a list of all authors. Any list of authors may be filtered to exclude very small or irrelevant contributions.``` [03:02:37] <-PM-Polskacafe#8382, replying to Orduin#1491> [5/5] I'd argue that option c) is satisfied even without linking fandom itself, as long as you credit the authors [03:12:02] Ah, well, let me adjust my statement to say that you need to fulfill the attribution requirements so there's no confusion. Our stance has always been that a full history export/import is sufficient. [10:40:42] Gonna put that somewhere, not on the main page though [11:00:20] like on [[mh:backrooms:TB:General disclaimer]] [11:00:20] https://mh.wikipedia.org/wiki/backrooms:TB:General_disclaimer [11:00:21]

[11:01:55] did it