[01:34:42] @marxismleninism hi [01:35:27] hi [01:41:45] Why can't private wikis host legal content that is against Miraheze content policies? [01:42:12] Because Miraheze Content Policy is only superseded by law [01:42:22] Just like a company that you work for would have policies [01:42:28] Or a school you attend would have them too [01:42:33] we have policies about what we want to host and what we don't want to host, that's it [01:42:40] If you don't like it, you can try a free web host [01:42:49] because that's not how platforms work, period [01:42:51] I'd also like to add - I don't really think we restrict all that much? [01:43:01] you follow the rules of the platform or you do not use the platform [01:43:08] We don't allow problematic content - what types of content would you want, anyway? [01:43:11] That’s the point of a content policy? Just because it’s not public don’t mean its immune. We host. We decied what we host. Simple as that [01:43:35] The basic question we all are eager to know the answer to is... What is it you want to have on your wiki! [01:43:58] On a platform called notebook.ai, you are allowed to have anything legal in a private world. [01:43:58] If I offer a locker service that don’t allow you to store humans limbs, I don’t care if the general public won’t see it [01:44:06] cook [01:44:16] we aren’t notebook.ai? [01:44:18] If you are unable to follow the policies that Miraheze has set forth, then Miraheze is not for you. [01:44:20] we aren't notebook.ai [01:44:22] Simple as that. [01:44:25] I never got super in to the platform because it doesn't resemble wikipedia enough. [01:44:30] good for notebook.ai, that's not miraheze [01:44:36] Self. Host. [01:44:43] Money. [01:44:48] and [01:44:48] What’s new [01:44:50] oh well [01:45:02] Nothing free is truly free [01:45:10] miraheze will not change its policies for your empty wallet [01:45:58] [1/4] You aren't getting any love here from anyone. Here are your options: [01:45:58] [2/4] 1) Agree to follow Miraheze's policies - we don't restrict much and are happy to host wikis for you. [01:45:58] [3/4] 2) Self host. [01:45:59] [4/4] 3) Find another platform to host your content. [01:46:09] If you don’t put into the work or investment to get what you want. You don’t get to bitch about not getting what you want. [01:46:32] miraheze is for community members :p [01:47:03] When I say truly free I mean without any rules, aka no content policy [01:47:11] ah yes [01:47:14] I have no issue with it obvi [01:47:16] Going to ask that tone stays civil here, please and thank you [01:47:37] Sorry- I can get a bit snarky, my apologies [01:47:38] I choose 1 but I will still actively advocate for the policy change. [01:47:49] it will not be changed [01:47:58] It is not logical. [01:48:05] It will eventually be changed with enough support. [01:48:06] I'm genuinely curious here: what policy change are you seeking? [01:48:08] miraheze has come too far and had too many people abuse its goodwill in more liberal times, it is not logical for it to undo years of progress [01:48:09] What is it you want to change in the first place [01:48:10] Like what clause, specifically? [01:48:11] We are community run. Get the community’s opinion [01:48:23] To allow private wikis to host anything legal in their country. [01:48:35] I'm curious what sort of content you'd want to host that's legal but against the content policy. Like, what specific clause do you have a problem with? [01:48:49] They won’t prob argee with you. Thats not a prediciton, it’s a spoiler :/ [01:48:51] the issue seems to be more principle of it [01:49:19] Right, but what are you looking to host? Is it the principle of a Content Policy itself for private wikis, or a specific clause in the Content Policy that you'd like to host and isn't allowed? [01:50:03] yeah i am very curious what they are trying to post that breaks content policy lol [01:50:10] The principle of a Content Policy itself for private wikis. [01:50:42] [1/3] If you want to rent a room in my house, fine, but I state that you're not allowed to smoke. [01:50:42] [2/3] You can agree to that, or complain but abide, or find another house to rent a room. [01:50:42] [3/3] Same principle aplies here. [01:50:43] I believe you may be looking at the term “private” incorrectly in this case. No offense meant. [01:50:52] It's a speculative hard-core science fiction project that might take a controversial turn. [01:50:56] [1/2] Good to know. Here's my answer: [01:50:56] [2/2] No wiki is truly private. SRE, the Board, Trust and Safety, and Stewards are permitted to access any wiki at any time. [01:50:59] How so? [01:52:40] And the main page is public to everyone as well [01:53:13] [1/3] I don't have clear plans on the controversial content and may never even make it, but: [01:53:13] [2/3] 1. If the wiki takes an NSFW turn, it will inevitably take a controversial/possibly offensive turn. [01:53:13] [3/3] 2. Just the very thought of a limitation to what I can make can drastically crash my motivation. [01:53:22] You could just make a page with “go away, or go to [[Mainer Page]]” [01:53:22] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Mainer_Page [01:53:22] [01:53:49] [1/2] 1. What type of offensive turn? [01:53:50] [2/2] 2. That's on you. We can't cater to every single person. [01:54:06] Are you intending to document or write it on Miraheze? [01:54:55] Yes, but because it looks the most wiki-like (uses MediaWiki), does not have page or storage limit, and is pretty great compared to Fandom. [01:55:16] tbqh it should get a storage limit [01:55:23] The offensive turn is something I would rather have through DMs. [01:55:30] Feel free to send through [01:55:31] My apologies for the miscommunication. I asked, are you going to write, OR, document [01:55:35] or be less willing to soak up hundreds of gigabytes for horribly inefficiently uploaded foot pictures [01:55:36] my DMs are always open [01:55:48] But whatever I say in the DMs, will I get banned on the server for it? [01:55:54] no [01:55:56] This is assuming I'm only communicating the ideas. [01:55:58] No, you will not [01:56:30] The fact you’re asking worries me slightly. But I appreciate the consideration in not sending it here [01:57:04] generally the only subject in creative writing (by experience) that tends to cause a run-in is when it ends up involving kids in particular detail [01:57:30] Feel free to send through and I will review [01:57:47] ew hopefully that isnt the case [01:57:48] That’s, um, certainly a way of putting it [01:58:09] I must concur with Eri on the matter [01:58:11] I never had to actually deal with a wiki that crossed that line and resulted in action but it's the only content policy vein we have which I've seen end up in the 'too controversial to host' camp [01:58:29] in regards to controversial worldbuilding/writing [01:59:07] Also someone remind me: modification of Content Policy is subject to the board, correct? [01:59:29] it is modified by community vote [01:59:38] Right [01:59:40] the board has generally little involvement except in the current case [01:59:45] Wasn’t sure [01:59:48] Thankd [01:59:53] the Board can technically do whatever it wants to :trollgod: [02:00:07] time to ban non-fiction wikis [02:00:10] an sre dude can technically do, well, anything [02:00:45] If you think about it, peer pressure is what keeps Miraheze together and in check [02:00:49] @human8462 curious did you decide not to send? [02:00:56] don't see anything in my DMs [02:01:05] :ThinkingHardMH: [02:01:11] holdup [02:01:18] there's a good point in there [02:02:05] @agentisai smartest thing I've heard all day [02:02:19] and it's actually good that MH works that way when you think about it. [02:03:23] sometimes [02:03:43] depends on how receptive the person is to their peers [02:04:04] naleksuh [02:04:08] I believe that the community as a whole exists of a few dedicated volunteers that want the best for the future. Too many couldn't be bothered, just like in real life. Anything that is far from their bed, keeps them apathic. But if something limits them, their aggression comes up. Unfortunately, that is even more so online, as we can "feel" anonymous on the internet. [02:04:27] Very true [02:06:16] Yeah, if something is hard then some people just don't bother [02:06:25] but we must be industrious [02:06:42] I'm sure we both know a thing or two about hard work \:P [02:11:48] Yeah, I believe that giving leads only to more happiness. Maybe people aren't appreciative, but I feel I have nothing to be blamed for. [02:12:57] A good reputation is good value. [02:15:05] I was busy with something. [02:17:43] Most certainly. As wisely said by our songbook, "giving reaps the greater happiness" [02:17:51] No worries [03:35:51] you don't have to describe taboo stuff in detail, just saying [05:55:02] <.labster> Did anyone ever get the skinny on what was being requested here? I'm a fanfic author and I'm working on the new content policy for Miraheze so I'm really curious. [06:16:07] fanon wikis will be allowed tho? [06:17:10] wait, does alt history counts as fanfiction of real events and people :ThinkerMH: [06:18:54] and did some poor soul believed in stuff from alt history wikis lol [06:25:07] <.labster> I’m reminded of this post from the FBI: https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/larping-and-violent-extremism [06:26:41] <.labster> How the duck quacks makes a big difference in whether something is fanon or misinformation, just like you aren’t LARPing if your anger is real [06:29:24] <.labster> I personally want to allow fanon wikis; if the ones we wanted to import had problems, we should look at those problems rather than banning a broad class of wikis [06:30:23] a have a concern on uh, celeb fanfiction [06:30:43] but otherwise it's harmless [06:31:02] Hey buds? Some of us just yearn for simpler times and hitting each other with foam sticks. [06:31:06] <.labster> What is that concern? [06:31:18] Perhaps with a trials and tribulations yarn attached [06:33:16] <.labster> The fact that Twilight exists is proof fanfic is not harmless [06:38:49] <.elizabethy_> Hello [06:39:04] Hi! [06:39:18] absolutely [06:39:32] I meant cases like real people shipping going out of hand [06:39:58] probably should add living [06:40:46] shipping dead peoples kinda weird too [06:40:57] need i remind you all of Jefferson Miku Binder [06:41:07] lmao yeah [06:42:30] [1/3] you can't stop shippers ofc [06:42:31] [2/3] but if it gets into a wiki form it might have a risk of misinformation/rumours source [06:42:31] [3/3] you see the thing is on ao3 and like "eh", but a wiki [06:42:40] <.labster, replying to theoneandonlylegroom> Going out of hand how? Libel, gratuitous sex? [06:42:57] parasocial [06:43:30] like that case when Sherlock fans went ballistic over something about on of actor's gf I think [06:45:41] but I guess you have more knowledge/experience, I just voiced a thing [06:50:06] <.labster> No I really don’t, I’m actually trying to understand the components. [10:56:07] Yes please. Never heard of that [10:56:47] [1/2] its not just jefferson though they did the whole cast of hamilton [10:56:47] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/615786602454581249/1200031505108447263/EQJcHOdU0AAIkV9.png?ex=65c4b36e&is=65b23e6e&hm=c1b84d56da03aabc5aa19caa172906c3b21c41dd390a957f23905a3e83c9684a& [11:00:26] this would be much preferred, I had a 'well shit' moment seeing a major class of writing just tossed out the door [11:04:09] <.labster> I'm somewhat motivated because I'm running a fanfiction wiki on Miraheze right now. [11:05:40] I'll probably never make a wiki but if I did a few have fan settings as inspiration [11:06:00] basically taking lore from starved games and making it a little more fleshed out/sane [11:06:15] i have a buncha ocs on my wiki so its a whole buncha multi-fandom stuff [11:06:55] would be reasonable for someone to inquire in the exact logic that made fandom wikis a sticking point on that rfc [11:10:42] <.labster> I keep asking, it's basically "we had to deny a bunch of questionable wikis" [11:11:51] <.labster> I wish someone would say "we don't want to host lemon" or "no real person shipping" [11:12:46] <.labster> But I also feel like it's a class distinction because fanfic is considered lower class as creative writing (and it often is worse, and skill level really does matter in how embarassing it is). [11:12:47] I don't recall fandoms necessarily being that questionable [11:13:08] but then I've been out of the loop for a long time so [11:13:33] and yes I see where the 'classism' comes from distinctly [11:13:35] <.labster> I mean, I'm watching Foundation on AppleTV now and it's totally a great fanfic of the books. [11:14:05] with modern media really driving the bar down on storytelling in IPs I would think fanfics suddenly might not be so bad [11:14:18] easier to thrive if you're compared to rings of power and not lord of the rings [11:14:59] How can you have time for that? Ispend 12 hours working on my wiki per day 😄 [11:15:04] <.labster> No, fanfiction is the original method of story telling before IP laws, where storytellers would add to other stories they've heard and embellish them. IP law has essentially stolen a whole mode of creation from us. [11:15:29] oh don't get me started on copyright and ip and that crap... [11:16:06] of all things mickey mouse is a great case study of greedy companies refusing to let go [11:16:11] ...And soon Formula1 starts again [11:17:07] Is there a Wiki about Formula1 on Miraheze? (Thinks out loud) [11:17:24] <.labster> [1/2] lately I haven't been writing. What we do have written is here, we'll likely make our wiki public after the move (British law is really bad for fanfic): http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=41&datecut=9999&prefix=0&sortby=subject&order=asc [11:17:25] <.labster> [2/2] the conceit is that universes are collapsing and characters from fiction end up in our universe, like a reverse isekai, and someone has to provide housing for them. [11:17:53] you mean like how we got "wizard of emerald city" in ussr instead of "wizard of oz"? [11:18:10] it would be funny to go from miraheze's open ends in a uk host to just not touching it in a more liberal us host [11:19:06] <.labster> Nah, it's a group project, other folks are still writing even if I'm lazy. We still have weekly meetings. [11:19:07] oh thats a cool idea [11:19:42] oh I meant from a policy perspective [11:20:04] <.labster> Ah, yeah, I get you. [11:20:40] I've mulled a bit on and off about a wiki to document my rethought plotlines for starcraft 2, based on a roleplay campaign that was partially completed in the sc2 arcade and just all the other thoughts which basically reframe everything from how units work to how the plot is executed [11:21:21] one of those things that could be nice but I know it would result in me doing a little for a week and then months of tumbleweed and repeat [11:21:59] <.labster> You sound dangerously close to original fictions there. [11:22:55] well it is very much based on the themes of starcraft and takes sc1 as completely canon [11:23:12] I was just dissatisfied with how sc2 approached it and that is basically original using the pieces of sc2 [11:24:00] had similar theories how to approach the diablo 3 story which was also a mangled mess including how to build in the character classes into a party but that is even less likely to see the light of day [11:24:02] Sc2? U mean StarCraft 2? [11:24:06] mhm [11:24:14] :EpicFaceMH: [11:24:44] Bro, all those games made by Blizz are my favourites! [11:25:00] Especially StarCraft! [11:25:23] I tend to cultivate a mostly thought and scattered notes collection of settings, a majority of the smaller ones are derivatives of IPs done 'my way' and a handful are "original" but more cleverly hidden derivatives of virtually every what-if for fantasy and sci-fi respectively [11:25:53] starcraft indeed has a crapload of potential and it went as far as theorizing how a story for three could look like [11:26:45] the third campaign I never did get far in and tbh it doesn't help that blizzard became particularly lazy in mission design by then [12:39:38] [1/2] Hi! I'm BurningBlaze05 and I've had my Miraheze page for a year. I've learnt everything from scratch (I also use Wikipedia as a guide, because I make Wikipedia articles and stuff (for F1 junior drivers and stuff) I'd rather use wikitables or create a way out of things rather then infoboxes as I suck at technology. [12:39:39] [2/2] Share your racing related wikis to me if you want, mines is very complex tho... [13:39:48] Please share a link [13:40:25] //name.miraheze.org/wiki/.... will do just fine [14:12:35] https://burningblaze05f1universe.miraheze.org/wiki/Main_Page [14:13:32] Your profile says your 50+. My 16 year old self feels super young now... you're the same age as my parents probably... (No offence) [14:15:19] The wiki is a WIP though. [16:06:21] no worries 😄 [16:07:44] Ah... Formula one ! Nice... [16:08:21] and the feeder series as well [16:11:13] Which websites do you follow as well? [16:12:56] (I've watched F1 since around 1998, had a Facebook group for a while, and follow most F1 related accounts on Twitter. I also have a few good sources on F1 and feeder series) [16:13:42] (I'm making a Userpage on your wiki... for the (near) future 😄 [16:32:43] [1/2] @marxismleninism [16:32:43] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/615786602454581249/1200116046892376064/image0.jpg?ex=65c5022a&is=65b28d2a&hm=571af8ac603f3534cdc35f98af970b4b752128b5d29382c7e664b3f9a292c55d& [16:32:52] Can you check what’s rule 11 and 12 [16:33:18] Also bet it was josh who kicked me [16:57:52] [1/2] I’ll teach 15 individuals to earn $50k or more within 72 hours but you will pay me 10% of your profit when you receive it. Note only interested people should apply, drop a message let's get started by asking (HOW) [16:57:53] [2/2] ‪Telegram: Carolinamason00 [18:02:30] I'm too young, what does that mean? [18:04:12] man [18:06:31] I assume the intention was 'which other wikis'... [18:06:32] I just go on Reddit and discord. [18:06:50] maybe I'm wrong, it is other full sites [18:07:21] the majority of things online are still web sites [18:07:40] knowing what wikis people actually visit would be interesting beyond things like meta [18:27:59] https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/mateusz.karmalski/viz/F1ResultsTracker/Results [18:28:07] I like this page. [18:29:20] On Twitter I follow @FeederSeries [18:30:49] They update you on everything related to the feeder series (F2, F3, F4, F4 regional, Formula Regional, Super Formula, and the like. They bring news about driver transfers, etc. [18:32:14] lightsoutblog.com is another one, with stats from the 1950 to recent [18:44:51] Ah okay. I'm on the F1FeederSeries discord. [19:03:09] (y) Didn't know there was one 😄 [19:23:29] Hi guys. [19:23:37] What are you playing at? [21:37:41] What’s up [21:37:47] I returned because I’ve heard of the migration [21:50:08] @pixldev , why don't most people want private wiki freedom? [21:51:35] The community sentiment was made quite clear I believe. The Content Policy exists for a reason. There's basically nothing a well-meaning person would have issues with, and no one wants to waste valuble server reasources on a private wiki hosting bad content [21:51:57] there was cases of abuse [21:51:57] Even more so if it's only allowed because it's private [21:52:11] What kind of abuse? [21:52:30] breaking Content Policy [21:52:37] d'uh [21:52:46] Which is ridiculous if it's just a private wiki. [21:52:54] also Miraheze stewards and sysadmins can see your wiki [21:53:16] They should only be monitoring private wikis to prevent illegal content. [21:53:19] <.labster> Private wikis must serve our nonprofit purposes under law [21:53:21] and where's the guarantee that you won't get hacked and the wiki gonna be switched to public [21:53:35] it's literally one setting [21:53:53] Respectfully, I cannot understand your logic [21:54:26] you just going here and say "hey, i know you said i can't do that thing but can i do it anyway" [21:54:36] I just don't understand how a community can be like this. [21:54:48] @human8462 , member of the board of directors here, respectfully this will not happen, we have certain obligations as a non-profit that can't be bent to 'whatever as long as it's not illegal' [21:55:03] considering that the second time happening within a day this is getting very suspicious [21:55:07] There is also a chance that a public wiki could be hacked with content policy violations. [21:55:26] I haven't even signed up yet. [21:55:34] <.labster> We can be like this because we want Miraheze to continue and thrive, not die in a courtroom [21:55:40] Name those obligations in particular. [21:55:51] This is likely the exact same confusion I have with your own logic. This is not to be offensive, I'm just saying [21:56:18] <.labster, replying to human8462> Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3) [21:56:42] A hack would be different than a wiki purposefully violating a content policy [21:57:44] And if it did(latter), we would deal with it accordingly [21:58:38] Explain the law. [21:58:51] it's public and not terribly hard to look up [21:59:40] dude, you already was told to self host if you wanna do that so badly [21:59:56] Which I won't be doing. [22:00:02] I don't need an extra cost. [22:00:10] and that's not our problem, really [22:00:10] Then you're not getting a wiki. [22:00:45] you want a wiki on a platform - you follow rules set by the platform [22:01:06] literally the same coversation as yesterday [22:01:13] nothing has changed [22:01:14] This is not a productive use of our time. @human8462, we are under no obligation to host your wiki if you will not follow our content policy. Please drop this topic and make your decision, further whataboutism will lead to a ban. [22:01:33] It's #offtopic for a reason. [22:01:55] Can I have this law explained please? [22:02:22] good night fellas, need those 5 hours of sleep lol [22:02:37] irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/exemption-requirements-501c3-organizations [22:02:41] Have you heard of Archive of our Own? [22:02:46] It's a nonprofit. [22:03:14] We are not Archive of our Own [22:03:20] If they do what you want. [22:03:30] But what makes the law apply differently to Miraheze? [22:03:39] Why are you trying to change another platforms policy [22:04:26] Banned. [22:04:26] I do think that's a good question and the board would benefit from a side by side compare [22:04:47] Appreciated. [22:04:59] Not that they'll get to see it [22:05:01] That was a nice headache I think we were all growing tired of. [22:05:02] Why was he banned [22:05:11] indeed not, but it's an interesting nugget [22:05:14] oi five miraheze bucks he ban evades [22:05:17] Repeatedly ignoring ask to drop topic. [22:05:19] True [22:05:41] If we are gonna go off topic, can we talk about boobs or something [22:05:53] lmao [22:05:54] :thistbh: [22:06:03] #info [22:06:04] wheeze [22:06:07] Let's keep it PG, folks. 🙂 [22:06:08] average internet user [22:06:10] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/615786602454581249/1200199964542894120/iu.png?ex=65c55052&is=65b2db52&hm=487f03ed218bf852bfbeb7f6d1a5fe14cb1a1044871cadd1e8d0b4a38519ed01& [22:06:12] awesome boob [22:06:23] they're goofy fellas [22:06:37] so true bestie [22:06:38] We're a wiki site, so we can be eductional :nffsUp: [22:06:44] NSFW content is prohibited, thanks though [22:06:47] Bird namers in english made some interesting choices. 😄 [22:06:49] 🙂 [22:06:51] hey on the topic of birds [22:07:08] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/615786602454581249/1200200205824442398/D4CMjCq.jpg?ex=65c5508b&is=65b2db8b&hm=7bfd84518abf807f8a61dd8d098e54bbf50e47d07724b2235f045880faaf68c9& [22:07:10] look at him [22:07:13] hes a borb [22:07:39] :moonch: [22:07:46] damn [22:07:49] oh yeah, there's another bird called ... [22:08:24] We've done a bit of this already, they were formed with a very different mission statement, but like... even they have a content policy? [22:09:14] I think their inquire was on the legal 501(c)(3) status and its obligations [22:09:18] it's among the most relaxed policies I've ever seen [22:09:32] though the fact they still have a particular policy is telling [22:09:53] and I have a feeling the odd examples going beyond are things they simply don't have the means to catch up to [22:11:31] It's one of those things -- if there's an unusually specific rule, there's a reason it got created. 😦 [22:11:37] Also what's the point of doing something "legal" if it violates a site's policies? [22:12:18] Seems sus [22:12:27] https://cdn.discordapp.com/emojis/932084789928935426.webp?size=48&name=ThisTbh&quality=lossless [22:12:53] I hope you guys don't have to deal with that often [22:13:09] Rare [22:13:13] Thankfully a rarity, but not a never-problem. [22:13:26] I'll admit, it was slightly ammusing [22:13:27] somewhat more likely to have something just flagrantly inappropriate [22:13:41] came across a wiki not long ago that encouraged u13 registration [22:13:55] :ThinkingHardMH: [22:14:00] Yup. 😦 [22:14:31] long dead now of course... [22:14:46] I wonder, with how many wiki's we have, how many could be hosting CP violating content since creation we dont knwo [22:14:58] maybe we could do a skim of some [22:15:03] a not-zero amount would be a reasonable guess [22:15:22] Audit/spot checks are planned down the line, but we've got more pressing stuff to clear out of backlog first. 🙂 [22:15:51] what I wanted to do/would encourage now is a system where wiki creators & stewards discreetly note down the names of wiki requests that aren't necessarily violations but either raise a warning bell gut feeling or have decent odds of attracting issues [22:16:07] That def sounds useless [22:16:09] that should reduce if the new cp is implemented but it's a way to try and keep an eye on early cases [22:16:17] [1/2] totaltennis.wikitide.org/wiki/Special:GlobalNewFiles [22:16:17] [2/2] You are welcome to check here occasionally and anything that does come across like that, as I would assume it would appear here [22:16:37] Honestly just a watchlist channel here on this discord restricted to WC would be good [22:16:37] Miraheze would have an equilvent list there too [22:16:40] globalnewfiles is a neat one, just peering in cvt feeds might be nice [22:17:00] we used to catch various strange happenings that way [22:17:01] A feature of CW would be ideal but we have better uses of time [22:17:10] smt like even a google doc would be nice [22:17:13] yeah, a cw feature just isn't likely [22:17:24] I set something up on cvt wiki a long while ago for that purpose but I doubt it's been updated [22:17:42] its last serious use was in doug times [22:17:54] Oh right [22:18:15] Do wiki creators have access to any private MH wiki's? [22:18:19] no [22:18:19] I know CVT has one [22:18:24] hm [22:18:37] oh well [22:18:44] discord prob good [22:18:53] IRC relay if any dont have it [22:19:08] yeah, gs & stewards link up on cvtwiki, more sensitive goes to stewardswiki, sre + ts + board had a staff wiki but I think there were changes [22:19:29] Who knows, maybe trusted people could be added to help review [22:19:32] we didn't want to go all in on discord earlier mainly because there were stewards, john in particular who were never on discord, but that's less of a limitation today [22:19:35] what was the URL [22:19:39] of staff [22:19:57] pretty sure it was just staff but I'm fuzzy and I never had access because I was never any of those roles despite having been a steward [22:19:57] oh [22:20:05] staff subdomain exists [22:20:10] h u h [22:20:15] https://staff.miraheze.org/wiki/Main_Page [22:20:27] Board and SRE [22:20:29] why- [22:20:45] its even labeled as SRE [22:20:58] srewiki dont exists [22:21:06] sre in its earliest times was the staff of the platform and staffwiki was made in that time [22:21:08] i think this is sre's wiki [22:21:13] Ja [22:21:21] board + ts came about there and there wasn't a need to split further [22:22:01] neither of those subdomains seem to exist [22:22:11] they've never had wikis as far as I know [22:22:45] board/ts/sre always had a reasonably tight connection even though there were fragments, not as bad as the fragments between steward/community ops and well, the rest [22:22:50] mb [22:23:24] these days the roles are more interlaced than ever so the idea of them ending up on completely different pages as they were up to the june split is unlikely going forward [22:23:31] [1/2] british descrimination [22:23:32] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/615786602454581249/1200204331845165056/LWAzqtI.png?ex=65c55463&is=65b2df63&hm=ac9c8d63dba02df5ac0813e8032ebb053ef442f26026d4f1d0f7ab2655cacd84& [22:23:49] well brits do seem like to add u's in odd places [22:24:01] that was a bad sentence, oh well [22:24:03] beuatiful and proper as all things should be [22:26:06] anyways a discord channel would be best i tihnk [22:27:33] it's a good start, raising awareness of things to double check later [22:27:43] it does require all active wcs to be on hand, I'm not sure if jph is on discord [22:28:48] would Libre let us have a private IRC to relay? [22:29:58] perhaps, but dunno if he's on irc either [22:30:10] and if not a full irc is a bit moot [22:32:57] I kinda wanna ask a WC for their thoughts on the matter [22:33:13] oh [22:33:17] jph do [22:33:19] lmao [22:33:20] . [22:33:27] i forgor [22:33:28] it's always been an idea floated steward-level but by all means [22:33:35] oh is jph here, that's nice [22:33:43] I just checked a support chat and he was answerign [22:33:56] brandon's another hand who's also been exposed to the idea [22:34:13] I honestly can't believe my wiki's team lead dont hate me just a bit because of all my stupid ideas [22:34:44] the key also is everyone on the same page; beyond keeping an eye out there's also approval consistency but I haven't been in the loop enough with this crew to know if that's a concern [22:34:57] he proves [[wikipedia:Project:IDEASBAD]] [22:34:57] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/wikipedia:Project:IDEASBAD [22:35:02] well i prove [22:35:11] He points it out [22:35:12] [22:35:19] there you are smh [22:35:29] it definitely was early '23 though it had been improving then, and then it slipped when most of the upper apparatus fell out [22:36:23] I've bounced what, 5 ideas in this chat so far, I'm the og for slapping out ideas of questionable value [22:38:10] I may go to Special:RandomWiki an dlook [22:38:53] I used to join all sorts of wikis mostly just to see what was going on out of curiosity, I did stumble on some problems that way; it's almost manageable if you do it often and use Special:WikiDiscover with the right settings. [22:39:09] You get an eye for titles that should raise eyebrows and you see what's up [22:39:29] [1/2] There is one imposter amoung us [22:39:29] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/615786602454581249/1200208347010441387/xjr5e3I.png?ex=65c55820&is=65b2e320&hm=4e3f041f8acae7c84cb04a61747cc75f9af4dd2b0d63bd2b66f98ab15053071f& [22:39:35] but that's how I also learned centralauth is a monster and my account is nearly broken [22:39:51] do it logged out if you do it with any frequency [22:40:19] open links to wiki in incognito - problem solved [22:40:24] mhm [22:40:50] I think I racked up what, 1800 attachments [22:41:26] https://tenor.com/view/skull-issues-gif-13031152103567454559 [22:41:50] Very much not recommended, over 1k things start getting weird/bad [22:42:01] at the end there it took at least 30 seconds to log in [22:42:04] thats disgusting [22:42:10] BRO [22:42:34] evil [22:42:36] I'm tempted to condemn it permanently [22:42:51] Condemn it to the boiler room of hell [22:43:02] CentralAuth really wasn't built for this kind of use case, definitely a dream of ours to replace it outright with something more purpose-built. [22:43:23] it's almost unavoidable if you steward enough though, I racked up attachments simply dealing with vandalism [22:43:33] does wiki.gg also use ca? [22:43:47] i go away for a minute and human comes back and causes me to thinik it's groundhog day and i'm reading yesterday's stuff. [22:44:01] in practice it was exactly that [22:44:07] lol same [22:47:08] as for checking wikis, i have approved a number that niggle at the back of your brain and you wonder if they're going to stay in scope. some type of audit process would be nice, but i have not gone back and checked any that i've created. there's the issue of time to do so and attaching my account to bunches more wikis. [22:47:50] it may be possible to incorporate it into CW process if we add a "conditional approval" option that then logs those that may merit future review [22:48:03] for such cases my suggestion would be to save the request to notepad or something and periodically send off to check up on [22:48:25] or as pixl went into, send it into a purpose-built sattelite chat (even a special thread in the wc chat) [22:49:14] you don't necessarily need to be the one to check up, indeed, it doesn't even need to be a steward who looks or someone looking logged in unless private of course [22:49:16] but, from some of the requests i've reviewed, i think this is a topic that merits looking into and i'm happy to support as best i can. [22:49:45] not that private should be looked at anyway without explicit good reason [22:49:55] but sometimes the home page is a tell that something is up [22:51:33] No, they use wgSharedDB which is why they don't have things like truly global echo notifs, etc. [22:52:40] Mmmm, I'm glad my number of attached accounts has gone down over time. There was a point where there was a less than 25% chance that I'd be able to login at all because it would timeout. [22:53:05] PFT [22:53:25] That sounds... bad [22:54:03] 1700 is considerable [22:54:14] I think I miscalculated mine, going to check ca again [22:54:23] my ca at one point would just regularly error out because of queries [22:54:33] But if this kind of stuff is not what CentralAuth where made for, then what was it made for though? [22:54:35] it's down to 1200 now [22:54:41] well it was made for wmf [22:54:44] It was made for Wikimedia [22:54:46] high on users, low on wikis [22:55:04] With their millions of prexisting users across maybe a dozen wikis [22:55:45] [1/8] > CentralAuth was designed specifically for Wikimedia projects which already had millions of accounts that needed to be merged into a global table. [22:55:46] [2/8] > [22:55:46] [3/8] > If you are starting a new wiki farm from scratch and have no need to merge existing accounts into a global table, it is much easier to set up global accounts using $wgSharedDB rather than using CentralAuth.[1][2] [22:55:46] [4/8] > [22:55:46] [5/8] > However, $wgSharedDB is only useful for preventing conflicts of username creations, and does not handle anything such as universal sign-on (instead, users are required to sign in to each wiki), or cross-cluster account rights and management. This extension provides said functionality at the cost of complexity. [22:55:47] [6/8] > [22:55:47] [7/8] > If you end up using this extension on a third-party wiki, it is likely that you will end up having to troubleshoot complex issues that potentially require diving into the source code to resolve. [22:55:47] [8/8] > You have been warned. [22:55:57] 1,278 end me [22:56:15] aaah, not so bad [22:56:27] I forgot you're still locked [22:56:38] it adds to the intrigue [22:56:58] I love 1134819.miraheze.org [22:57:06] speaking with miraheze's most wanted [22:57:42] apparently I'm still a ballmedia consul [22:57:53] theres so many 0s i cant crtl f [22:57:55] it jsut [22:57:57] gives up [22:58:10] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/615786602454581249/1200213048871370822/MnYskzM.png?ex=65c55c81&is=65b2e781&hm=8db263192be34be41dc7c3534e9a42108f3845e2a2876615d93d8a3aac7fb647& [22:58:30] the fun of opening too many wikis logged in [22:58:36] how riveting [22:59:03] my global edit count was smashed pretty hard by some wiki deletions [22:59:13] but outside of meta the majority is just cvt rollbacks and such [22:59:57] Same [23:00:01] and it looks like another 393 will drop off soon [23:00:09] My global edit count on my main account (former) has collapsed like a rock [23:00:21] i guess i'm underperforming only being attached to 174 wikis [23:00:31] you're sane [23:01:16] well, not really. i've got a lot of edits. they're just in a very few wikis [23:01:24] that's a good concentration [23:02:05] I compensated on wiki attachments for the fact my top three remaining edit counts include a deleted wiki, meta and cvtwiki [23:04:17] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/615786602454581249/1200214590190010469/IMG_5761.jpg?ex=65c55df1&is=65b2e8f1&hm=b6e4d12688af0b956d6f843a0e4362cbc8ca650f7329a45ac2dbd07d0fcc9330& [23:04:37] Recently I’m a game collector and I got this behemoth [23:07:10] MGE Main page i suh [23:07:15] something [23:14:13] <.labster> I have wondered if AO3 got its exemption via literary rather than educational, but I still suspect educational since literary is so limiting [23:14:39] The Internet Archive exists too [23:14:51] Free information for everyone [23:15:51] <.labster> It exists for now, I expect publishers are going to take a big bite out of IA in that book lending lawsuit [23:16:09] Yeah [23:16:34] Seems like everything will change in this year [23:16:43] There goes the oldest Mickey’s copyright [23:16:59] <.labster> There is such a thing as nonprofit suicide and IA is in the danger zone [23:17:15] let's hope Disney doesn't attempt to lobby for the tenth time [23:18:41] It's disney [23:19:05] there was a club penguin wii game???? [23:19:20] Yes [23:19:27] But this is the Limited Edition variant [23:19:31] isn't disney fiddling with trademarks to try and screw over people using mickey? [23:19:40] oh ive never seen it before i just played the ds games as a kid [23:19:44] oh thats cool [23:19:48] Remember kids, your vote will always come second to the people who made Baby Yoda! [23:19:49] Great memories [23:19:51] ie, sticking the original media into their animations [23:20:10] What the fuck is going on [23:20:10] @blakeishere Watch your language. [23:20:15] And by the way the Limited Edition variant is never released to the public [23:20:22] Shoo dyno [23:20:23] There's like 5 seperate conversations going on at once lol [23:20:25] It’s given to Club Penguin employees who worked the game [23:20:40] Oh thats so cool you managed to get your hands on it then! [23:20:44] Yes [23:20:53] Because of this, this is the most expensive Wii game you can get [23:20:59] jeez [23:21:21] It's off-topic, it happens. [23:21:30] how much [23:21:52] <.labster> We just can’t host literally everything. Part of it has to do with our nonprofit purpose specific to us, part has to do with our small budget (AO3, IA, and WMF all have orders of magnitude more budget), and part of it is just that we can’t just be turning web hosting into a tax deduction [23:22:00] $400-600 [23:22:06] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/615786602454581249/1200219073003409658/IMG_5809.png?ex=65c5621d&is=65b2ed1d&hm=ad47b9b30972a1ff684cbd7de6a8b6e115bbee6bb9be12088f065044d6f6c4c2& [23:22:13] I found one listing for $449 but it’s heavily water damaged [23:22:17] The one I have is in great condition [23:22:18] darn [23:22:27] omg [23:22:57] <.labster> Don’t tell Agent, he may snap up anything penguin related [23:23:08] Ok [23:23:12] Agent, save your dollars, it's not worth it. 😄 [23:23:51] eBay: 5 Benjamin franklins for a cool black label cover art. [23:35:51] just to start another random conversation [23:36:23] odd that within the last couple days, there's been a few folks wanting to host wikis outside the content policy [23:36:55] like human wanting to host whatever if it's private and another wanting to host commercial (or commercial-related) stuff. [23:37:05] where'd these come from all of a sudden? [23:37:22] It could be normal or probably more spam users than usual [23:40:35] Could also be that our name is just getting out there more from natural growth/growing anti-FANDOM sentiment. [23:41:20] I really do want to start a wider 'how'd you hear about us' community survey, not only are the stories interesting, it's also helpful to know how we're getting growth and expand on those areas. [23:43:34] maybe add it as an optional field in wiki request? not sure what participation you'd get otherwise, but i also wouldn't want to make it a required field [23:43:57] I feel bad comparing that guy to human ngl [23:43:59] (it would be interesting to read in processing the requests) [23:44:35] true [23:45:04] That was one of the possible routes we considered, in fact. Adding an optional field on requests. [23:45:04] oh, yeah, totally different. human was fixated. it just struck me as odd to see two wanting to justify circumventing CP [23:45:50] I don't see it as a valid comparision, bypassing the CP was humans goal, other guy wanted to know if something violated CP [23:46:32] RE: the commercial inquiry, I'm glad the user asked. It's something that's right on the cusp, and we're still trying to get the exact balance figured out too. [23:47:00] looked to me like they were trying to find a way to work around it, but i could be wrong. [23:47:20] in any case, not as persistent and adversarial as human [23:47:23] Hm [23:48:25] [1/4] It's a bit vague, for example: [23:48:26] [2/4] * Wiki to document a recording label's internal prodecures - Approved [23:48:26] [3/4] * Wiki to document artists and the creations done in coordination with the studio - Approved [23:48:26] [4/4] * Wiki that will document all records currently produced by the studio with links to purchase them - Declined [23:48:43] So I can totally get having questions regarding it. [23:54:53] i do agree this shows good intent on the poster's part. so, to @pixldev's point, it's way different than human who simply wanted to do whatever they wanted. [23:55:23] it just struck me as odd to see both of these within the last day or two when we don't typically see such things.