[03:29:33] If you become a Steward. I'd vote for you. [03:29:40] I don't even know you. You just seems cool. [06:37:09] I feel like the consideration of potential stewards should be a little more rigorous than that. [06:37:30] You're voting for one of the highest access levels on the platform. [06:58:06] You should understand history. Doug's request for Wiki Reviewer was literally just withdrawn for how controversial it got. [06:58:15] He was previously a steward [07:15:58] there's a #Miraheze Communities thread btw. might be more noticeable there [07:56:33] :O [07:56:53] ping Petra in volunteering [07:56:58] or in the thread actually [07:57:37] hi [07:57:52] hello MirahezeRelay [07:58:31] hi Crystalite13 [07:58:48] hehe [07:58:53] you double pinged me [07:59:06] hehe [07:59:16] @nukesme [07:59:25] its not the same on discord [07:59:32] oh yeah [07:59:41] well except if you reply to yourself with a ping [08:00:22] hi [08:01:11] a [08:01:24] b [08:04:10] theres a town in Poland called me [08:04:17] as in nukesme [10:59:04] wow [13:42:49] I uh... I mostly live under a rock. [13:42:58] So... Uhm. This is awkward. [13:44:45] Checking someone's contributions is a good idea before suggesting they become steward [13:46:42] True... But alas. I'm just a boy. [13:46:57] Plus. I only hang out on the discord. [13:47:09] and that stops you reading? [13:50:32] Yes. [13:50:46] I don't even know most people here. [13:50:54] Like, I only know you as the F1 guy. [13:50:57] (Literally). [13:51:32] Sigh [15:20:14] I'd suggest that you maybe know people a bit better before supporting applications for steward of all things. [15:21:17] steward is the the most trusted role with access to intrude other people's privacy/access someone else's personally identifiable information [15:21:30] so i would at least check their contribs [15:21:45] ||i should do so for pix, but there was too many supports for me to doubt them|| [15:22:33] https://x.com/SekAndTheCity/status/2086135011313430751 [15:23:32] I would always say to form your own opinions irrespective of the consensus. As long as the reasoning is sound, even if I don't agree with it it's more valuable to discussion than just following the majority. [15:24:03] @justleafy2003 [15:26:24] i'll try to that next time then [15:27:15] honestly this is accurate [15:27:20] absolute crap, yeah? [15:41:18] You should always do due diligence, especially for Stewardship, not matter how capital P Popular the candidate is [15:41:54] well it's too late now [15:42:03] It’s not actually [15:42:34] You are more than welcome to do whatever diligence you wish now, and then either leave your opinion as is or change it with what you find [15:44:47] Honestly, as much as I appreciate the overwhelming support I would still love to see people putting me under scrutiny and formulating an opinion on my actual actions and not just my slaying personality [15:45:19] I can assure you that I took your actions into account when deciding how awesome you are [15:50:09] Echoing others, I also did observe your actions and do my due diligence; I was satisfied. Do you want me to ask you a couple questions on there for fun while we wait until closure can happen? :P [15:51:00] I won’t say no, grill me a bit [15:51:39] heh okay, I'll try and think up a couple good questions. We still got like, what, 5.5-6 days [15:52:08] Doesn’t need to close at 7 on the dot [15:52:14] that's true [15:52:16] We've got like 4 or 5 days left, plenty of time [15:52:19] My RfAS was a landslide and that was open for 11 days [15:52:23] Or 10 [15:52:24] could absolutely stay open for a bit longer :P [15:52:26] I can’t count [15:52:37] Up to the closing Steward, whoever that may be [15:55:10] yeah, my RfS was stagnant after ~36 hours and stayed open for another ~16 hours when NDKilla was able to close it (this was back before the policy was amended by an RfC to add minimum discussion timeframes, which was certainly reasonable) [15:59:51] Especially as meta has become a less happening place, we were getting more complaints that people were completely missing votes entirely [16:00:03] The change in policy was mostly a reaction to that [16:00:58] I'm happy with where we landed, more reasonable than short closes as soon as the threshold is met or keeping an RFC open for a month [16:00:59] [1/2] fair enough, the thing is [16:00:59] [2/2] i feel like it's basically pointless as most of the people who scrutinize already did so...and i would be doing basically a task that has been done and confirmed by multiple people before [16:01:37] People make mistakes [16:01:45] Or may have different priorities [16:02:06] Or may just be riding off someone else’s opinion, like you are (absolutely no offense intended at all) [16:05:14] tbh I put my trust in NA/Raidarr, if NA believes you're worthy of it then I trust their judgement for it, that's all really [16:13:56] notaracham: yeah, agreed [16:23:23] I scrutinized 😎 [16:27:14] [1/2] @originalauthority may I ask for curiosity, how long tasks on phorge take when they are claimed? [16:27:14] [2/2] I am in no way trying to speed things along, I just want to know how things works behind the scenes. [16:28:04] How long is a piece of string ? [16:28:15] That depends what task you're talking about [16:28:26] We have tasks that are nearly old enough to go to school [16:30:41] > We have tasks that are nearly old enough to go to school [16:30:41] That's an apt description. I like it :) [16:35:13] dmehus: I'd quite like if none of our tasks made it to school tbh [16:37:16] [1/3] It’s https://issue-tracker.miraheze.org/T14053 and https://issue-tracker.miraheze.org/T15103 [16:37:16] [2/3] if I am reading it correctly - 15103 is easy, fast and ”okayed”, but its functionality is included in 14053 which was claimed, which to me, sounds like easy and kind of fast to implement, and ”okayed”, because of the claiming of that instead. [16:37:17] [3/3] So I am just curious on what to expect. [16:38:37] RhinosF1: yeah [16:39:36] That's not had a security review yet so it could be a while [16:41:52] Oh both needs security reviews? How do they work? [16:43:26] Someone qualified to do so makes sure there's no vulnerabilities as a result of installing them [16:44:06] Through code review, any privacy impacts and looking at the likelihood of future issues [16:53:01] Oh. So the claiming means something else? [16:53:56] Claiming means they plan to work on it [17:18:21] I got half way through the review and got distracted, I'll finish it later tonight [17:42:07] you're welcome for the scrutiny 🩷 [18:32:50] Based [18:33:21] I'm used to just calling them AI slop tho but this is clever [18:38:00] I try to call it image creation instead of art [18:53:22] "AI crud". [23:11:33] [[Special:Diff/555010]] when adding in the section header I actually wrote upintheskye initially [23:11:33] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:Diff/555010 [23:11:34]

[23:18:34] truly my evil knows no bounds [23:43:32] strongest oppose, pix name capitalization confuses me [23:44:11] trust raidarr but not Raidarr [23:49:34] fair points [23:50:15] * dmehus always feels like he has to adjust the displayed lowercase 'r' when pinging 'raidarr' on-wiki :/ [23:51:04] I actually misspell it more often. Is it missing the e or the second i?