[04:29:01] I can't tell if you're doing some balatro puns or not lol [04:30:22] i originally thought fandom is also special bc it's in wmf's interwikis (with many entries named wikia and fandom), but i checked just now they also added weirdgloop and miraheze [04:33:00] i'm not sure when the two were added. i think i didn't see them last time i checked wmf's interwiki, or maybe i overlooked it [04:35:42] but maybe fandom is still special in the sense of awb. if you want to use awb on other farms you have to choose custom [08:56:01] [1/2] quick question, what is interwiki data [08:56:01] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/615786602454581249/1544269587561058416/image.png?ex=6a97e4a0&is=6a969320&hm=9928611d6b572ca8589a4932533b49ea2f465ac9b0380c321c5dc54070666b3a& [08:58:05] interwiki table in Special:Interwiki [09:49:49] I use JWB as I hate WINE [09:56:52] I recently seen a forked wiki on fandom get vandalized and noticed that it’s really only soap members who are working to revert the damages and enforce the forking policy, etc instead of fandom staff [11:22:24] even staffs are tired of it [12:13:24] ngl I can't see how SOAP would not get tired of it either [12:14:20] they already extensively deal with vandalism cases on actual active wikis on fandom unpaid [12:50:49] iirc soaps are unpaid right? [12:51:02] they love fandom more than paid staffs [13:13:47] I think so [13:13:59] I haven't seen anything to indicate they are paid [14:32:59] they are volunteers, yes [16:21:07] yep [16:21:29] volunteering to fight vandalism isn't wrong. in fact, I think it's a good cause [17:00:32] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/615786602454581249/1544391520181031023/image0.jpg?ex=6a98562f&is=6a9704af&hm=282ffd94249f8b02be55adec1d2c4a4ea2f181c7c745c54488e83365060632cf& [18:36:59] Also, am I alone for hating templatestyles [18:48:39] in what way do you hate templatestyles [18:49:05] with Extender I think it's generally quite usable despite the numerous flaws [18:49:34] I like the colours of that flag but also I'm not from that country [18:52:47] I find it inconventent and annoying, as I tend to use vector2022.css for my needs [18:53:23] the issue with sitewide css is that it gets loaded onto every page, even the ones not using the template [18:53:28] and gadgets are annoying to set up [18:53:38] Luckly, I use very few templates [18:54:58] My wiki has 18 templates, and probly 2-3 can be removed [18:57:09] I tend to reuse the same hunk of CSS as much as I can [19:11:26] anyone serious would tell you to use gadgets instead [19:49:51] Depends if you know CSS but not JS. [19:50:27] Personally I know neither so I ignore them both, but there's reasoning to be made either way depending on what you're familiar with. [19:51:02] more effort to set up + non-admins can't edit [19:53:43] really??? [19:53:45] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/615786602454581249/1544435112056455248/SaveTwitter.Net_VuB5si2vSuYufR5R_720p.mp4?ex=6a987ec8&is=6a972d48&hm=3da7f2f6431e046a101e9f901b46a4329dfb334d7afc442c41318dbd391975f9& [19:53:51] is there a source for this im curious [19:55:18] yes that's why they call it sitewide CSS [20:22:53] how bad is it [20:30:59] its effort is negligible [20:31:14] the non admins is a major drawback though [20:32:28] one day WG will make the perfect extension for it [20:34:06] maybe they will, maybe they won't [20:34:47] the only 2 things that could happen thank you [20:35:47] maybe they will go bankru [22:35:56] is using `position: absolute` on web design a good idea [22:36:37] depends what u need to do [22:37:02] i use it for buttons mostly [22:37:16] is using for a skin a good idea