[09:26:16] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bluemoon0332> @cosmicalpha I actually would've liked the approach of querying WHOIS just two days ago, but I learned that WHOIS is on it's way out
[09:30:31] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bluemoon0332> RDAP is a replacement for WHOIS, in fact as of 2025 operators of gTLD will no longer be required to offer a WHOIS server, only an RDAP one: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/global-amendment-2023-en
[09:31:06] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bluemoon0332> This I just discovered yesterday btw
[09:31:27] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bluemoon0332> for us RDAP is even better than WHOIS because it is machine-readable JSON over HTTPS
[09:34:16] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bluemoon0332> here's miraheze.org's info over RDAP if interested on what it looks like: https://rdap.publicinterestregistry.org/rdap/domain/miraheze.org?jscard=1
[09:39:57] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bluemoon0332> only problem with RDAP is that not many ccTLDs have implemented it (https://deployment.rdap.org/) but I think the writing is very much on the board here
[09:52:49] <MirahezeRelay>	 <rhinosf1> @pixldev deploy tool saying non-zero exit code in prep isn't always bad. It just means you should pay attention to the output and confirm it's expected before rolling out.
[09:53:05] <MirahezeRelay>	 <rhinosf1> I've noticed them often recently
[09:53:12] <MirahezeRelay>	 <rhinosf1> @agentisai what's it been moaning about
[09:53:44] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bluemoon0332> if it is what MacFan said, root owning RequestSSL's folder instead of www-data
[09:54:07] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bluemoon0332> the one on test151 was because of merge conflict, according to MacFan as well
[09:54:24] <MirahezeRelay>	 <rhinosf1> Root owning folders will do that
[09:54:33] <MirahezeRelay>	 <rhinosf1> Because it runs as www-data
[18:25:34] <MirahezeRelay>	 <cosmicalpha, replying to bluemoon0332> Fair, though I now added another PoC using RDAP
[18:27:35] <MirahezeRelay>	 <rhinosf1, replying to bluemoon0332> That's cool
[18:27:39] <MirahezeRelay>	 <rhinosf1> And new
[18:27:55] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bluemoon0332> Right??
[18:28:02] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bluemoon0332> If only I had discovered it sooner
[18:28:37] <MirahezeRelay>	 <rhinosf1> Heh
[23:04:34] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bluemoon0332> @cosmicalpha not a bad implementation, since we only care about the nameservers
[23:04:47] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bluemoon0332> we can roll with that until there's some proper library for this
[23:08:21] <MirahezeRelay>	 <bluemoon0332> So, I'll finish the CNAME and rDNS one, then move to make some class for your implementation, and we can _finally_ close T11699