[02:37:32] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign> [1/4] Custom domain expiry:
[02:37:33] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign> [2/4] 2025-10-11 16:54:22,281 - ssl - WARNING - https://wiki.eggnos.studio has expired
[02:37:33] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign> [3/4] 2025-10-11 17:14:23,102 - ssl - ERROR - https://atlas.starworld.zone has expired: NameResolutionError
[02:37:33] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign> [4/4] 2025-10-11 17:17:29,317 - ssl - ERROR - https://wiki.truevanilla.org has expired: NameResolutionError
[03:43:01] <MirahezeRelay>	 <xaloria45> Does this current issue with CreateWiki affects all wikis with CreateWiki extension or only Miraheze?
[04:13:00] <MirahezeRelay>	 <notaracham> I assume you mean wikifarms, and don't know.
[04:13:48] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign> I saw that CA rolled back some CreateWiki changes related to AI, so maybe we're falling back temporarily to OpenAI.
[04:15:45] <MirahezeRelay>	 <notaracham> We are, yes.  Plan is still eventually to move to an in-house model, but reversion is so we can build/test more before another production deployment (and ideally make it easier to swap between providers/models going forward)
[04:16:09] <MirahezeRelay>	 <notaracham> That's unrelated to the ongoing wiki creation issues, though.
[04:19:05] <MirahezeRelay>	 <ghostvista, replying to posix_memalign> is that why when my wiki says approved but it isnt created?
[04:19:35] <MirahezeRelay>	 <notaracham> Yeah, I believe a comment was left to that effect, though it may not have properly pinged/saved
[04:20:00] <MirahezeRelay>	 <notaracham, replying to ghostvista> The rollback isn't why, we're having some issue with our tech stack that's not properly creating wikis after approval.
[04:20:17] <MirahezeRelay>	 <aeywoo> Isn't there a manual way for us to make the wikis ourselves in the meantime.
[04:20:26] <MirahezeRelay>	 <notaracham> Manual method isn't working either. 🙁
[04:20:33] <MirahezeRelay>	 <aeywoo> What, how
[04:21:20] <MirahezeRelay>	 <notaracham> Did a decent amount of poking at different variations with CA but couldn't figure out a solution.  Giving it a night's rest as it was end of day for both of us.
[04:22:21] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign, replying to notaracham> [1/2] I thought it'd be really nice if we can program it in a service-agnostic way to take advantage of free apis and switch providers when one of them is having issues. I heard from some colleagues that university students can get Google Gemini Pro for 1 year for free, but I wasn't able to get that somehow. If I could, I would definitely donate my api key to
[04:22:21] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign, replying to notaracham> [2/2]  MH lol. Gemini is one of the best model right now (if not the best) by some benchmarks.
[04:23:16] <MirahezeRelay>	 <posix_memalign, replying to notaracham> Ah yeah I think I saw some discussions about new wiki creation having issues. Just as I thought this month is very peaceful and there is no headline candidate for MH Monthly...