[01:52:42] The expand box control on the add details question is a bit small and hard to see [01:53:42] Not to sure we can do anything about that but I agree and will take a look. [01:59:11] Thank you for taking a look, I agree that changing an interface element like that might be diffcult/undeseriable. [02:06:44] By the way, this is very minor, but if deployment won't happen for a long time, than it might be worth adding a note to the demo in case a search engine indexes it and someone actually wants to make a wiki. [02:08:14] We don't index special pages anyway. [02:08:48] And submission won't work, it will just show something saying submission is disabled because it's a demo. [02:09:25] Deployment will likely be in a week or two though if there is enough positivity about it on the Request for Feedback. [02:09:31] That's what I was worried about, people being frustrated after spending time filling out the form. But since it's not indexed, it's not an issue. [02:09:50] Overall I really like the design. Thank you for making it. [02:10:15] Of course. I have a lot more planned after it also, in particular redesigning ManageWiki and WikiDiscover next. [02:10:56] There will be numerous RfFs for things coming over the next few months to a year. [20:12:01] [1/2] [20:12:01] [2/2] Generated this from log entries using JS [20:16:40] I took the liberty of excluding suppress/checkuser/autopatrolled. I think it might also be worth excluding patroller and translator [20:28:47] Good work accounting for non-contiguous terms of service [20:29:04] I like the colon syntax [20:29:11] And the use of ISO dates [20:43:14] [1/5] other potential keys, useful for tables: [20:43:14] [2/5] - `languages` array of strings [20:43:14] [3/5] - `other_names` [20:43:15] [4/5] - `discord` [20:43:15] [5/5] - `irc` [20:44:01] there don't actually seem to have been that many patrollers, and it is a moderation role, so maybe that can be kept [20:44:31] wiki reviewers on the other hand there's a lot of them [20:47:34] Right now the tables can be updated to use this data. I'm thinking usage like `{{StaffTable|wiki-creator|super=assistant-steward, steward}}` [20:48:12] graphs will have to wait until meta is on 1.46 but I think could basically be used the same way. maybe some colours would have to be specified [20:51:09] [1/9] ``` [20:51:09] [2/9] {{StaffTimeline [20:51:09] [3/9] |wiki-creator [20:51:10] [4/9] |super=assistant-steward, steward [20:51:10] [5/9] |color-former-assistant-steward = #FF69B4 [20:51:10] [6/9] |label-assistant-steward = currently assisting the stewards [20:51:11] [7/9] |label-former-assistant-steward = no longer assisting the stewards [20:51:11] [8/9] }}``` [20:51:11] [9/9] (for now I'd just implement the first two parameters though)