[18:20:28] [20:23:44] [1/3] (Please ignore my AI profile picture - it was made for a parody) [20:23:44] [2/3] I was wondering what a Wiki Reviewer would think of this request. I would decline, as Wikis about one 'person' are not allowed. If I were actually reviewing, my decision to decline would be heavily influenced by AI 'music' being the opposite of creativity and a bad thing in general. [20:23:45] [3/3] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:RequestWikiQueue/90967#mw-section-comments [20:31:01] <_arawynn> One might argue it falls in the World building category since it's entirely fictional [20:37:36] Interesting, the requester would probably use that to justify if the request were declined. Listening to my tears ricochet by Taylor Swift (about how her music was stolen) right now, and it's making me wonder about if AI 'music' should be allowed - unfortunately, there's no policy stating that it shouldn't [20:43:20] [1/2] @_arawynn What do you think about this request? I wrote on my practice request page that I would ask someone else for a second opinion, but lean towards declining. [20:43:21] [2/2] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:RequestWikiQueue/90721 [20:45:49] <_arawynn> Extremely difficult. On the one hand, I understand where they come from wanting to create a Wiki for that but I also think something like a diary would be a better place for it. But I don't know for certain on what base/policy it'd be appropriate to decline [20:53:46] [1/3] Yes, I was thinking that Miraheze just isn't the place for it, and something like a diary would be infinitely better. This is exactly what I wrote on my practice: [20:53:46] [2/3] > "This might be the most difficult practice request I have done so far. I don't think that Miraheze is an appropriate place for this, as it is about highly personal, sensitive content. I don't think that one should write this kind of thing on a site that could experience data leaks, or have volunteers (e.g. Stewards) violating policy and accessing the Wik [20:53:46] [3/3] i without reason. I would lean towards declining this, but I would ask for the second opinion of someone with more experience in being a WR." [20:57:54] <_arawynn> [1/2] I very much hope the accessing without reason is extremely unlikely though logically, the risk is never 0, but again - I don't really see a policy to decline [20:57:54] <_arawynn> [2/2] Also sorry but I'll be unlikely to answer any further since it's time to go to bed for me [20:58:26] Thanks, I was about to go to bed too [20:59:11] Any time we're (NDA-holders that can view private) visiting a wiki, there's always a reason. 😅 [20:59:31] We've got too much to do to be scrolling through folks' private diaries. [21:00:04] But, good to call out as a risk - private isn't 100%, total, forever private. [22:04:57] but I thought you loved attaching your account to new wikis [22:07:48] Gonna catch 'em all or crash the servers trying [22:08:19] https://klipy.com/gifs/pokemon-squirtle-29 [22:13:07] what's that, you're only attached to like 15% of all wikis? get those numbers up smh [22:14:36] I'm definitely top 10, but not a challenger to the elite 4 yet [22:55:50] annoyingly global patrollers don't have a local right so can't use Waki's othergroups module [23:59:03] [1/2] One day if NotAracham gets renamed to Aracham...the servers will go kaboom... [23:59:04] [2/2] I wonder just how much load would this do, like seriously