[13:56:58] hello everyone! [14:10:33] Hi [14:14:03] Hell9 [14:14:10] Hello* [14:14:20] typo lol [14:18:32] Cocopuff2018: Hello [14:27:39] 👋 [16:51:54] * Hispano76 greets [16:57:25] * Ugochimobi greets you too [16:57:40] as if it worked -_- [17:08:14] As much as this is probably a bit of drama and should be taken elsewhere, I'm pretty sure this reversion shouldn't happen https://meta.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Community_noticeboard&type=revision&diff=194528&oldid=194526&diffmode=source [17:08:16] [url] Difference between revisions of "Community noticeboard" - Miraheze Meta | meta.miraheze.org [17:08:27] At least not from a non-admin on meta. [17:09:02] They edited while logged out. [17:10:25] Hidden it based on the leak of IP if so [17:18:52] Fair enough [17:20:02] I do think John has a decent argument to make regarding the consensus business and wiki responsibilities; perhaps instead it could be made more clear that they are able to determine in those cases with sufficient evidence and clarity. [17:20:33] It reminded me in passing that such things are also part of Global Sysop's job description. [17:21:31] Global Sysops don't deal with disputes, strictly speaking [17:22:10] John was clearly in the right here too. He said that "I didn't read his message, it seems". Yes, I have a tendancy to just skim through pages without even reading the whole thing. [17:24:54] Either way I think I'd much rather see the Steward's policy play out favorably than add additional policy for a reactionary example, as much as I found the example appropriate [17:24:56] The new RfC confuses me as (afaik), if a wiki is closed but the community consensus is not to close it, a Steward could reopen it following a vote to reopen the wiki so codifying this into a policy makes little as it'd basically be redundant [17:25:10] s/little/little sense [17:25:19] Mainly I didn't bother to check the Stewards page to review the details [17:25:39] Pretty slim to none, right? [17:26:36] I do think we could use a proper funnel/direction for those things to happen so wayward users are able to congregate in a formally acceptable way, ie, on the CN or SN as suggested within the RFC. [17:29:55] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435711390544560128/880141954980126800/unknown.png [17:29:56] Now this is just amusing [17:33:56] Yeah, why did he oppose, especially when this involves him in some way? [20:07:05] * tn waves [20:07:59] hello [20:08:28] Hi tn [20:15:11] How's it going? [20:17:29] tn: it could be worse [20:17:32] How with you [20:19:11] Duchess the sponge is involved in drama continually [20:21:31] all of the Qualitipedias at this point [20:21:56] I mean, if there's this much drama with the current incarnation of them, I can't imagine how crazy the Reception Wikis were [20:22:07] RhinosF1: not bad thank you! [20:22:41] @Agent: don't try [20:23:13] Who's tn? [20:23:29] <✨ TheresNoTime ✨> (me) [20:23:32] <✨ TheresNoTime ✨> 😮 [20:23:38] Oh. [20:23:50] `wikimedia/TheresNoTime` [20:24:08] I get it now. [20:24:23] Welcome! [20:24:35] <✨ TheresNoTime ✨> How's everyone doing? [20:26:51] tn: your Twitter is fun [20:28:52] :D [20:42:34] tn: British people on Twitter often are [20:42:44] One of my friends is probably the craziest [20:45:13] * RhinosF1 realises that sentence would be appropiate in any context [20:56:55] :P [21:58:59] tn: i think I just sent them on a crazy high [22:21:21] That's funny to read. "On a crazy high"