[00:00:44] Resource loader is varnish [00:00:48] So that wouldn't help [00:01:04] It was working on testwiki wasn't it [00:01:19] No, it wasn't [00:01:53] Right so 1.37 broke more stuff [00:02:42] * RhinosF1 needs to sleep [00:03:23] Oh no RhinosF1 is gone [00:03:35] Except cache isnt cleared and testwiki is still slow [00:03:51] Can't do anything at moment about it being slow [00:04:25] Can you stick like ?v=1 on the end of the loaded js [00:04:30] See if that tricks it [00:05:02] I can't stick anything on there because the page loads it, I can't change what URL it loads [00:06:55] Actually, it doesn't even matter. I tried manually and adding a new query string doesn't change what it does [00:07:02] So I wouldn't even need to change that anyway [00:13:09] Oh, actually, only Twinkle itself was being passed to dev, not morebits [00:13:18] Now I will pass through morebits [00:15:39] Okay, should be working on dev and test now [00:15:45] ah [00:16:25] I'll try get it working on meta now [00:19:55] okay [01:28:11] ugochimobi : Should be working now [01:30:20] Naleksuh Still big [01:30:39] Huh? [01:30:41] What is big about it? [01:31:53] TW big [01:31:59] ???? [01:32:04] What about it is big? [01:32:08] Looks the same for me [01:32:12] I checked all the dialogs [19:01:02] Hi everyone! :D [19:02:22] Hey [19:27:17] RhinosF1 Are you a real rhino? [19:27:52] Asking the real questions... [19:34:57] insert x-files tune [19:47:10] Naleksuh: that's what an LTA once asked :O [19:47:16] * Reception123 thinks Naleksuh is secretely an LTA [19:49:37] JohnLewis; irc note for ongoing request on the [[SN]] to correct permissions that were not correctly assigned on wiki creation, last topic on page [19:49:37] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/SN [19:49:38] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/SN [19:49:49] [url] Stewards' noticeboard - Miraheze Meta | meta.miraheze.org [19:50:26] and if you can could you also look at the "Issues with inactivity" exemption request? [19:50:56] Not to dogpile, and a note that the requests for adoption page is getting a wee stale :p [19:52:47] Reception123: that looks withdrawn? [19:53:28] JohnLewis: maybe we're looking at a different one [19:53:33] I see them saying "I would be very much interested in an exemption. Thank you for the information! Kind regards, Chloe." [19:53:41] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Stewards%27_noticeboard#Issues_with_inactivity [19:53:45] [url] Stewards' noticeboard - Miraheze Meta | meta.miraheze.org [19:53:52] Naleksuh: no [19:53:53] We indeed are :) [19:53:57] heh [19:54:09] Ah, I see the one you were looking at yeah [19:54:27] tbh, I think that exemption discussion was bungled [19:54:39] yeah, it's a bit odd [19:54:40] I think it is withdrawn, but it might not have needed to be [19:56:17] What was the other request, Requests for Adoption? [19:58:40] and done now I believe [19:59:44] πŸ‘ [20:12:46] JohnLewis: you're leaving my Rf parser function count [20:15:15] Done [20:16:51] Okay [20:17:15] I think infoboxes were fixed globally after the upgrade [20:17:48] Infoboxes are now fine on meta too [20:47:20] there was something wrong w/ infoboxes? πŸ€” [20:48:01] @JohnLewis: You haven't set the parser function count on gratispaideiawiki, you've only done gratisdatawiki [22:48:39] uh, what's going on here https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Meta:Protection_policy [22:48:40] [url] Meta:Protection policy - Miraheze Meta | meta.miraheze.org [22:48:57] we're making policies now evidently [22:51:02] I can tell that Tyler is doing this in [[w:WPAGF|Good Faith]] [22:51:02] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WPAGF [22:51:21] [[w:WP:AGF]] [22:51:21] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:AGF [22:51:22] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:AGF [22:51:23] [wikipedia] WP:AGF | "Assuming good faith (AGF) is a fundamental principle on Wikipedia. It is the assumption that editors' edits and comments are made in good faith – that is, the assumption that people are not deliberately trying to hurt Wikipedia, even when their actions are harmful. Most people try to help the project, not hurt it. If this were untrue, a project like Wikipedia would be doomed from the beginning. This guideline […]" [22:51:38] But it isn’t necessarily needed [22:51:43] At this juncture there is a definitive trend of [[w:WP:CIR]] [22:51:43] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:CIR [22:51:44] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:CIR [22:51:45] [wikipedia] WP:CIR | "Wikipedia is a big place, with many editors, all with their own opinions on how to do things. It seems surprising that we are able to work together functionally, but somehow this is what usually happens.One of our core Wikipedia guidelines that facilitates this is assume good faith. It is good advice, reminding us that, when we disagree, everyone involved is (usually) trying to do what they think is best. Sure, […]" [22:52:05] I was just having that conversation with a meta admin earlier >.> [22:52:29] Strictly speaking I am not opposed to the information, but that big policy banner needs to go. [22:53:13] This page documents an official Miraheze Meta policy [22:53:42] I've since remarked it appropriately. [22:53:56] Ah yes, this is better [23:07:23] I agree with this assessment