[01:45:34] Hello Guest7788! If you have any questions, feel free to ask and someone should answer soon. [03:00:12] darkmatterman450 [03:07:29] yes? [03:30:39] Was there a reason for the ping Naleksuh? [03:30:57] Are you still interested in wiki creator channel? [03:31:26] Wiki Creator channel? I think that might just work out just fine. :) [03:31:38] Cool [04:57:43] "Cool" Antônio Sá [11:19:02] I'm interested in a private and public function each for wiki creators [11:19:32] mainly because I can't decide on the better advantages of either and would like both, even if the private is more third party in function due to the legalese that is loosely enforced for this server [11:19:59] At the very least a proper public one though [15:07:59] is there any way to make on-wiki-JS feel less "delayed"? [15:08:58] I wish I could make my own dark mode script, and it's kinda easy actually, but that milissecond delay really bothers me, lol [15:10:30] I notice even in CSS that can happen, it also bugs me [15:10:57] you might be able to do something like that with gadgets [15:11:04] but I can't think of any way to do that with userscripts [16:30:23] raidarr : A public one? [16:30:30] Why a public one? [16:30:34] Let me inv you to the private one [16:32:17] A public one would allow for direct inquiries for ongoing requests, open question/discussion of the process and filter in related content as appropriate, but I don't think it outweighs a private per se, and having a private is an excellent start [19:44:46] agint [19:44:48] agent [19:47:51] Naleksuh: I'm guessing you're inquiring about the "On hold" status for wiki requests, correct? If so, SRE will vote this week on what ideas to pursue for this year and I'm fairly certain the "On hold" status will be selected. [19:48:22] Agent : Actually, no, I was just going to tell you I sent you a channel invite, but sure, that works too [19:48:37] Yes, SRE please select on hold status [19:49:01] ah [19:49:03] didn't even see that [19:49:08] * Agent hasn [19:49:14] 't been on IRC for a while* :P [19:49:49] Also, can any Stewards online run this? https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Stewards%27_noticeboard#CheckUser_request_PNY10004 [19:49:56] [url] Stewards' noticeboard - Miraheze Meta | meta.miraheze.org [19:50:07] DarkMatterMan4500 removed my block on test wiki, and the suspected sock has taken the opportunity to cause even more disruption [19:51:08] Actually, Dmehus is already running it [19:51:10] Perfect timing [19:53:25] I did that because only a Consul should do non-test blocks like that. [19:53:48] That's not actually a rule [19:53:53] I have done plenty of non test blocks [19:54:02] The rule is that crats cannot remove non-test blocks by consuls [19:55:12] Then why did dmehus warn me on my talk page regarding that? [19:55:27] Don't know [19:55:41] Also, dmehus did plenty of non-test blocks before they were a consul [19:57:07] Before and after. [20:00:19] dmehus Could you also explain what Naleksuh is talking about? [20:20:22] dmehus: lol, you beat me at restoring the previous revisions! [20:45:54] Reception123 : I'm not sure they should have been restored at all [20:46:05] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Don%27t_restore_removed_comments [20:46:05] [wikipedia] Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments | "If a user removes a comment from their own talk page it should not be restored. By removing the comment, the user has verified that they have read it. The comment is still in the page history, so it is not necessary to keep it visible just to show that the user received the message. It is also wrong to force them to keep it there as a sort of "badge of shame".There are several […]" [20:49:12] Naleksuh: I don't agree with that and think that users should archive their talkpages and not remove them permanently [20:49:31] Especially users who are blocked and warned so that we can see if they've already been warned and what was said [20:49:35] Okay, they can archive it to the page history [20:49:40] Without having to look into history [21:03:35] Personally I'm rather inclined towards user agency regarding their own talk as well as user pages; logs should cover for blocks, though I admit warnings and other reputational notes for research would be made inconvenient by deliberate page blanking [21:49:34] Reception123, lol [21:50:05] dmehus Oh, finally, you're finally here. [21:50:47] DarkMatterMan4500, yes and I saw your .tell. What e-mail address did Reception123 message me at? Please don't post my full e-mail address here; just say which provider :) [21:53:26] Yeah, dmehus, you have been ignoring everyone for like a week [21:53:30] As is usual by now [21:54:41] I'm accustomed to it as him being away from the platform dealing with life, to simply call it ignoring seems a touch disingenuous [21:55:13] If everything depends on his response time being down to the dot, that might be an issue of a system where things heap on him when there ought to be 1-2 backups for his function [21:55:46] @Raidarr, a touch? :p [21:57:11] I wouldn't even reveal your email address anyway. [21:57:33] Raidarr : Don't worry, there are [21:57:43] dmehus just likes ignoring me but continuing to make edits [21:58:14] Naleksuh You've kind of been a bit more aggressive recently. [21:58:20] I haven't observed your discourses that closely, I guess he'll have to speak for himself [21:58:59] But I will admit at times when your approach easily dives into the realm of caustic, I wouldn't blame someone adding a few days to the turnaround time as for worrying about it [22:02:28] Not gonna lie, it just been a bit unnecessary if I may add. [22:02:38] I replied to Naleksuh privately and will reply to Raidarr next now [22:02:58] okay [22:03:16] dmehus : I haven't asked you anything in like a week [22:06:38] It doesn't mean I was "ignoring" you. I saw your direct messages and was planning on getting to them in due course :) [23:06:41] Server hiccup or the images are not showing? [23:10:29] Would be better to ask in #miraheze-sre-relay, but looking at the resource graph (grafana), all of the servers seems to be high