[08:25:16] i cannot create account [08:26:05] ? [08:27:18] [discord] please be more specific, do you get an error message etc [08:27:43] chaptcha [08:28:13] Guest33: please use the request account form [08:29:02] i know [08:31:25] I need to lock an account [08:33:17] SAE [08:34:45] this is a globally banned user sock [08:37:19] [discord] that was strange [09:42:33] i need lock a account [10:34:05] [discord] why am I getting mr. foundation vibes from this join, odd messages, exit client cycle [11:37:12] It is them [11:49:51] [discord] hi rhinos. I know I shouldn't have made that second account at the public test wiki, but considering that I reported it and only made two edits with it, do you think my block could be changed back to the way it was? I don't think I was actually abusing multiple accounts, just made a spur of the moment bad decision. [12:08:24] No [18:37:45] [discord] @chrs could you make an af for me? [18:37:46] [discord] Blocks users with Funny in their name that has been registered for less than a month? [18:38:00] [discord] i suck at abuse filters tbh :p [18:43:00] [discord] might be more prudent to flag/disallow/block for funny identifier type messages that are pretty predictably constructed [18:43:16] [discord] be a bit draconian to block FunnyGuy24 for happening to find your wiki [18:45:06] [discord] issue [18:45:06] [discord] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435711390544560128/975831276634398760/unknown.png [18:45:35] [discord] What's the issue here? [18:46:01] [discord] maybe itll be helpful to regex Funny and a number after it? [18:46:24] [discord] but what i was trying to point out was andy hasn't been using identifier at all for those edits [18:46:44] [discord] either an ipv6 or a username of andy5 or something [18:46:50] [discord] Maybe a tactical change? [18:47:29] [discord] once i figure out regex he can change his username but ill destroy them [18:48:13] [discord] the naming is almost irrelevant and really isn't the issue [18:48:16] [discord] the action itself is the key [18:48:43] [discord] I can just see a filter regarding a word as ubiquitous as 'funny' with no other conditionals equating block be a needless cause for false positives [20:01:36] [discord] would suggest instead using a filter targeting page titles with keywords like `funny` and `identifier` [20:01:57] [discord] not opposed to that either :p