[00:51:48] hello [00:53:13] guys, is there a way to make pages on cosmos skin on full width like on the main page? [06:32:41] I wonder how long does it usually take for a wiki to get accepted/denied. I'm okay with waiting a few more days. [07:38:21] if it's on human review queue now then it can take 2-4 days yes [09:37:22] Current backlog (oldest unhandled request) in request wiki queue is about 2 days 17 hours (54 requests). [09:38:05] You can always refer to https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Rodejong/Wikicreation/FAQ [10:37:38] hello i want some of my pages to be only edited by buerocrats how can i do that [10:53:46] give them admin level protection [10:54:05] You can use Special:Protect [10:54:36] With that special page you can change the article's editing permissions [10:54:43] when i gave the pages admin level protection buerrocrats still cant edit it [10:55:46] [1/2] it seems that buerocrats are missing 💔 [10:55:46] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1433409037575262300/a.png?ex=690495b2&is=69034432&hm=9b60b2de4209ee02d042bc199173a321cc5837d19a5155b6520e8f1976761450& [10:56:25] Only administrators [10:56:33] it doesnt have to be buerocrats im fine with any usergroup that i can put [10:56:35] That's only option... [10:56:46] i mean yeah when did that buerocrats still couldnt edit it [10:58:31] F [11:05:41] i mean bureaucrats can just give themselves admin, which they should have anyway [11:06:10] can you tell me how i can remove someone from buerocrat [11:06:15] i am the wiki owner [11:06:53] you'll need to edit the bureaucrat user group to allow removals [11:12:25] [1/2] normally only steward can remove bureau role ... [11:12:25] [2/2] in general it's recommended to not give bureau role carelessly [14:16:14] How do I customize pure black mode on citizen again? [14:18:42] `.skin-theme-clientpref-night.citizen-feature-pure-black-clientpref-1' [14:19:19] [1/2] what the sigma [14:19:20] [2/2] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407537962553966603/1433460263528435792/image.png?ex=6904c567&is=690373e7&hm=5b22d79dba18699688730286551a695f127b15fd75ac6370861bab0f1c449535& [14:19:32] I gave them le `!important`s too [14:19:50] what the freagk! [14:20:03] maybe change the normal dark mode css to `:root.skin-theme-clientpref-night.citizen-feature-pure-black-clientpref-0` [14:20:13] Alrighty! [14:20:59] Weird that the styling applies when I'm editing [14:21:54] wdym [14:22:02] when u preview it happens? [14:22:12] When I go into the editor [14:47:44] So let's say that you post something on a Miraheze wiki and then you regret posting it. How do you go about deleting it forever so it is not even in history? [14:47:47] hi, is it possible to submit a new wiki request after already submitting one, just so the AI can check that my text is correct this time, or do I have to wait? [14:49:11] does this involve personal information and are you an admin on said wiki [14:49:23] you'll have to wait [14:50:05] pskyechology: I am the admin of the wiki. It does have something that is personal and I made a mistake copy/pasteing it. [14:50:08] Okay 🥲 [14:52:38] [1/3] as an admin you can delete the revision from history, see here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:RevisionDelete [14:52:39] [2/3] however, do note that other admins on the wiki will still be able to see it [14:52:39] [3/3] since you say it is personal, I would email stewards@miraheze.org to hide it even from admins [14:58:59] pskyechology: thank you so much! This is very helpful! [14:59:19] ofc ^_^ [15:38:11] guys does anyone know how i can make a request to miraheze so they can reset the usergroups [15:38:19] as the wikiowner i cant do anything rn [15:38:50] wdym by reset the usergroups exactly [15:39:07] like i changed the permissions of buerocrats and adminstartor [15:39:15] it seems like i have lost my own permission [15:39:26] can you link your wiki [15:39:40] https://balkansirl.miraheze.org/ [15:40:49] congratulations on beaching yourself [15:41:00] make a request on [[SR/M]] [15:41:01]

[15:41:30] haha i didnt realize i was a buerocrat too [15:41:37] i was trying to remove a user from buerocrat [15:41:40] but couldnt [15:41:48] thank you [15:42:49] repaired [15:42:57] who needs to be removed [15:44:20] woah a wild steward appearance [15:44:26] quick someone get the master ball [15:44:28] i thank you with all of my heart [15:45:21] who suggester earlier today to edit user groups of bureau ... [15:45:37] Cheeseonbanana89 [15:45:44] it was me 💔 [15:45:57] hmm [15:46:07] yeah i couldnt find that [15:46:10] i apologise [15:46:18] no, i mean [15:46:45] like i said before, we are usually send to stewards for bureau removal [15:47:02] ohh [15:47:12] so you manage the bureaucrats [15:47:56] [1/2] there was a discussions about meddling w/ permissions which i find to be risky, especially w/ newbies [15:47:56] [2/2] the established process is to ask stewards [15:49:07] yes yes i created a new group to edit the admin pages but i couldnt assign that too [15:49:25] then i edited the bureaucrat perms wich just ruined it [15:49:27] i couped myself [15:51:59] why $wgParserEnableUserLanguage is not in magenewiki? [15:52:10] complete [15:55:03] [1/2] if you do want to manage locally, the way is to change group assignments for bureaucrat in Special:ManageWiki/permissions so that bureaucrats can unmark themselves or each other in UserRights. However this is not more prominent because it is risky, and opens a door to local power struggle if someone not entirely trustworthy has that access. That could be even messier than just bricki [15:55:03] [2/2] ng bureaucrat's own permission if the leadership of the wiki is not clear. But there is nothing from a policy perspective preventing bureaucrats from self-assigning the access and then self managing [15:56:50] ah i see thank you I created a group called owner that has all the permission for example but it seems like i cant give it to anyone else i also made a group that can edit pages taht normally only admins can but i cant assign that to anyone either can you tell me how please [15:57:10] [1/2] If it's something that might come up more it may be possible to set up a group that is locally established as 'higher than bureaucrat', which has the authority to manage any bureaucrats at will. Anyone with managewiki permissions access can still coup the wiki, but then it will be easier to tell in logs who's doing what. You could also use this approach to create an "80% bureaucrat" [15:57:10] [2/2] that has everything but permissions [15:57:46] what you've described is the first approach, so what you need to do is give bureaucrat the ability to assign it. That will give you the ability to do that, and then you can remove that right from bureaucrat [15:58:21] this can't stop a bureaucrat from doing the same thing but at least makes the chain of authority a little more clear if a random bureaucrat did decide to do a coup [15:59:09] if you decide to take the approach where bureaucrats can't manage permissions, you must give managewiki-permissions to owner first, and only then can you remove it from bureaucrat. This ensures you have the proper access at all times and is the only way to handle managewiki permissions safely [16:00:41] congratulations you just won the prize of making a [[Phorge]] ticket [16:00:42]

[16:02:00] i noticed [[phab:T13037]] [16:02:01]

[16:02:09] and found no reason why it's not added [16:02:37] i assume thats when claire wasnt tech yet [16:02:44] btw the similar $wgAllowSlowParserFunctions (also only enables a variable) is in managewiki [16:02:46] so she just speedran the safest way [16:02:55] regardless, make a phorge ticket [16:04:34] [[phab:T14457]] [16:04:35]

[16:15:31] is there any reason to use fontawesome ext instead of their native library? [16:15:48] i noticed fontawesome ext breaks from time to time (tho it's fine now) [16:19:15] [[mw:Extension:FontAwesome]] says `Font Awesome CSS Custom Properties can be used as properties for classes.` but unless you use its parser functions at least once on a page, style for the classes doesn't load at all tbh [16:19:21]

[16:20:00] loading from our server vs loading from elsewhere [16:20:10] is what i'd say from a quick glance [16:20:11] [1/2] `