[01:24:52] [discord] 😭 [02:26:05] [discord] :blessed: [09:57:18] [discord] @macfan4000 could you explain further because we can remove sensitive rights by setting it to false? [13:46:18] [discord] im remaining opposed to the CA idea [13:55:29] [discord] You're right we do not need to perform test of CA at testwiki.. [13:58:17] [discord] there isnt really anythijg on CA that can be used for testing [14:12:38] [discord] im also strongly opposed to giving zippybonzo any backend perms or system admin [16:06:08] [discord] For what it is worth, I don’t think these comments are constructive @cocopuff2018. Respectfully, you have a history of being opposed to any idea proposed by Zippybonzo, and this comment further confirms this in my mind. We get it: you are opposed. You don’t need to keep restating that opinion with no additional rationale. Thanks, Globe [16:10:22] [discord] It would be way easier if I wasn't blocked globe to see ur messages [21:50:33] [discord] modification of global rights would have to be restricted to stewards or above, as you cant restricted the ability to assign specific userrights via the CA UI [21:53:09] [discord] renames just on own account is not technically possible without custom code, global rights modification has to be restricted due to the possibility of users accessing restricted rights, and global blocking is pretty much the same as local blocking, but IPs only [22:00:22] [discord] @macfan4000 due to this I think CA isn't a good idea [22:07:45] [discord] modification of global rights would have to be restricted to stewards or above, as you cant restricted the ability to assign specific userrights via the CA UI. (edited)