[08:45:08] hi, is there another WD irc channel to discuss problems? [08:47:38] whats wrong with this one? [08:51:11] haansn08: recently I asked a question but didn't get a reply for hours ;) [08:51:37] most people are in the Telegram group these days, but that’s not exactly another IRC channel ^^ [08:52:05] yep - so I try it again...: [08:52:46] I'm mapping on osm and for 3 4 days I get a strange error msg from the validator [08:52:59] https://pasteboard.co/KfmOitv.jpg [08:54:30] for some tags - for example tag=town - I am told it were a member of subclass 'person' Q215627 [08:55:31] is it still a problem? I remember fixing it [08:56:04] and I have no idea WHERE to search this error - investigating mentioned Q-items I didn't find any connection [08:56:29] you can create the talk page of the item with {{item_classification}} to see the subclass of hierachy [08:56:29] 10[1] 10https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Template:item_classification [08:58:16] haansn08: what and how did you happen to fix? [08:59:52] > katpatuka‎: See [[Talk:Q735428]]: town in China -> town -> community -> social group -> group of humans -> human -> person [08:59:52] > removed "group of humans -> human" [08:59:53] 10[2] 10https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Talk:Q735428 [09:03:30] haansn08: hm - the screenshop given (a quarry) has landuse=quarry, resource=copper and name tags... [09:12:22] katpatuka: i don't quite catch on... do you have a question? [09:13:47] well, the problem you had fixed happened with "town in China" - there was no such error for "township of China" [09:14:21] but now its a "quarry" - how could that connect to "person" ? [09:15:48] whats the wikidata item? [09:18:36] haansn08: Q188040 [09:20:32] hm, I don’t see anything especially strange in the parent class tree there https://w.wiki/3sUA [09:26:17] Lucas_WMDE: me too - the quarry's tags are here: https://pasteboard.co/Kfn387l.jpg [09:26:34] it does show up in https://w.wiki/3sUJ though [09:27:20] ah, via mining company ... operation ... organization -> group of humans -> human [09:28:28] oh lord! :D [09:29:30] tbh I’m skeptical of that group of humans -> human link [09:29:41] (though it might not be the only problem here) [09:30:04] how many others there may be... [09:30:11] i removed that a few days ago, if it's there again maybe my edit was undone [09:30:40] well I keep on mapping and will tell you if there are other tags with problems - thanks a lot! ;) [09:30:43] haansn08: yup, https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q16334295&diff=1476748695&oldid=1476447806 [09:31:07] (and since it was done as a restore instead of as an undo, you weren’t pinged) [09:31:57] it seems like the constraint is wrong if that's the "fix" [09:35:23] and I agree that group of humans as a subclass of human seems wrong, grouping humans together doesn't merge them into a single mega-person [09:37:10] there are of course some edge cases where something could be either, reality is weird like that, but for the most part it's either one or the other [09:38:56] (edge cases that come to mind: conjoined twins and people with DID)