[02:15:52] OI, what's with all the ontologies that have a a journal artice as their 'official website'? [19:29:51] Anyone around for a simple question? [19:32:11] P735 (given name) is meant for 'everything before their family name', right? Like, Q3273297 [19:32:11] “José Luis Sanz” [19:32:11] should have P735 “José Luis” [19:32:11] right? [19:32:18] er...sorry [19:32:53] and P735 left unset if we know there is an initial but not what it stands for... [19:35:17] ooooh, lol... "double name" (Q1243157) is a thing... [19:37:55] I found https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Names/Help, so I gues that answers that. [19:39:48] Names are HARD [19:40:03] I'd argue that's very much not a simple question :P [19:40:12] I'm thankful there's a Wikiproject for that. [20:10:51] Yeah, it's giving me the guidance I need. [20:12:01] I'm learning how to do Web -> OO Calc -> Quickstatments by fixing the ~300 items that link to sciencedirect (including fixing/creating the peeples) [20:12:27] OI, what's with all the ontologies that have a a journal artice as their 'official website'? [20:16:48] perryprog, I think my general answer is going to be not mess with first names unless I actually know (after collecting various IDs) what seems to be their full name... obetween ORCID, Publons, CienciaVitae, and Google Schoolar they usually say what the initial means somewhere. [20:17:09] (and it's a 'western name' so I have a clue, lol) [20:17:29] What's worse is birthdates that conflict on different RS's [20:18:59] This.... https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Jitrixis/nameGuzzler.js [20:19:10] I like that.... lots. [20:19:52] the 'copy their name to all Latin script languages' (once you have stuff like accents right) [20:22:36] (not used it yet, just found it from that project page, but...boss) [20:24:42] My 'longer term' idea is to use the same method to 'eat' the NASA Astrophysics Data System via BibTex exports. [20:26:27] Not farm the whole thing (nuts) but things like conference proceedings [20:27:10] http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs_doc/conferences.html [20:32:56] Do you know if there is a bot that 'fixes' DOIs? Like, where it's the whole url, or, apparently, making them uppercase [23:14:59] Hello [23:24:49] does anyone here talk? [23:40:08] Very rarely [23:40:21] Sup? [23:41:22] wanted to know if this is the right place to restore a page that has been deleted [23:42:15] Like, an actual 'page' on wikidata, not an item? [23:43:02] item [23:43:23] what item do you have in mind? [23:43:34] its a person [23:44:04] listed on IMDB [23:44:16] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard is the place to ask onwiki, but you might have found someone who can do it. [23:44:27] being on IMDb is usually not enough to warrant undeletion [23:44:48] Who is the person? [23:44:51] also an author on Amazon and Barnes & Noble [23:44:59] similarly [23:45:08] since you can get your own way into both of those platforms [23:45:48] preferably if there were a database this person was in, that they could not have added themselves to (meaning someone else unrelated to that person had added them), then we could talk more [23:46:21] the item was here - Q108284821 [23:47:00] nope, not undeleting that, goodbye [23:47:52] Oook, that was interesting [23:48:51] is it good to be on wikidata as an item? [23:49:52] Apparently not, from what he said. I can't see it. [23:50:42] (looks at logs) [23:51:07] how about this one - Q108102254 [23:52:54] Looks, looks at imdb. Yeah, no. Harshad Ghodke does not meet the (amazingly low) WikiData notability policy [23:54:37] hmm... I have seen people with YouTube channels have an item on Wikidata so thought being on IMDB would be considered notable [23:56:26] Yeah, the wikipedia 'otherstuff' applies... the real 'notability rule' (at least, that I think most people rely on) is #3. [23:56:47] "It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful." [23:57:55] Like, I just created an item for some random research group at a university in Spain, so I could add the affiliation to authors of the articles they publish. [23:58:53] how about Q108102254 - he is mentioned on lots of websites [23:59:04] Problem with IMDB is it's not generally considered a 'serious reference'