[17:03:07] given three entries on the same topic, does it matter which two get merged into the third? [17:07:17] (Q28645581 Q112440333 and Q95329271 ) [17:22:57] Dragonfly6-7: normally merge into the oldest one (lowest qid), although if one of the others has a lot more sitelinks and statements then an exception can be made [17:23:07] In this case definitely use the lowest qid, Q28645581 [17:25:29] I believe the lowest qid does not have the most statements [17:29:09] meh, debatable [17:29:10] * Dragonfly6-7 merges [17:29:16] Q28645581: 18 statements, Q95329271: 14 statements, Q112440333: 4 statements [17:29:45] no sitelinks at all [17:31:29] * Dragonfly6-7 shrugs. Done. [17:32:21] Q28etc and Q95etc looked to have similar amounts, although obviously if you're going to cheat by actually counting you'll get a different result [17:33:59] Well you should almost always use the lowest qid; only if there was a significant reason not to use it should you pick another one [17:37:09] * Dragonfly6-7 nods [17:38:11] I'm amused that Q666 was pre-emptively assigned to "666" , presumably to avoid associating it with anything else [17:40:04] and, interestingly, Q1488 is associated with a Nazi collaborator [18:14:56] is there a property for "founded this company" ? I tried "founded" and leads to "founded by", which feels like it would have the causality the other way. [18:18:22] X founded Y is the opposite of X founded by Y [18:21:24] ... I found "founder of", which is a Q instead of a P. Is there any way to fix that? [23:21:03] It would be great if the constraint violation reports mentioned whether a value is deprecated. Those include things that were added by bots from other databases and marked as 'invalid value' or 'refers to different subject', but they show up in those reports as if they were normal entries that need to be fixed.