[05:30:29] <Nemo_bis>	 legoktm: fascinating question :) 
[05:33:06] <legoktm>	 I was re-reading https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Neutral_point_of_view earlier and noticed Wikidata was missing from the lead and then couldn't find a policy. But also no page explicitly disavowing a policy.
[06:17:14] <Nemo_bis>	 legoktm: I'd argue NPOV applies to Wikidata, but not literally as expressed in Wikipedia; instead you'd find NPOV-like principles in other Wikidata guidelines. An explicit statement of something similar to NPOV would probably end up being similar to the Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) 2016 https://repository.ifla.org/handle/123456789/80 , particularly the principles of Economy 
[06:17:20] <Nemo_bis>	 and Sufficiency and necessity.
[06:19:36] <Nemo_bis>	 For instance in https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1317 it would not be neutral to overpopulate "occupation" property with dozens of subclasses of "criminal" or similar, which would serve no purpose other than to stress how bad the person is
[15:03:55] <legoktm>	 Nemo_bis: makes sense and that matches my expectation too. I think I remember Denny talking about this at some point, I need to dig through my archives
[16:48:11] <wm-bot>	 Change on 12meta.wikimedia.org a page Wikidata was modified, changed by 2.202.1.243 link https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=23656614 edit summary: [-3502] 
[16:48:34] <wm-bot>	 Change on 12meta.wikimedia.org a page Wikidata was modified, changed by -Alabama- link https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=23656616 edit summary: [+3502] Undid edits by [[Special:Contribs/2.202.1.243|2.202.1.243]] ([[User talk:2.202.1.243|talk]]) to last version by Pols12: reverting vandalism