[12:56:07] <wikidasher>	 Hello
[12:56:44] <wikidasher>	 Can somebody help me understand what's happening here
[12:56:45] <wikidasher>	 Q1423448
[12:56:54] <wikidasher>	 Q669163
[12:57:46] <wikidasher>	 I feel they are duplicate
[12:57:57] <wikidasher>	 but I'm not sure, I don't know if there is a nuance I'm missing
[12:59:08] <wikidasher>	 except in one or two wikipedias, when both items are linkde to an article, one is a redirect to the other
[13:01:47] <phschafft>	 let's see.
[13:03:22] <phschafft>	 I think one is a special case of the other.
[13:04:05] <phschafft>	 which is also given by the subclass property.
[13:04:58] <wikidasher>	 That's why I think something is off: The descriptions in both items are describing the same phenomenon 
[13:05:49] <wikidasher>	 and in Q669169, it is linked to CWE-128, which is wrong, the item is not describing a wrap around error,but an overflow
[13:06:44] <phschafft>	 I'm not sure about that.
[13:06:50] <phschafft>	 also the descripts are slightly different.
[13:07:05] <phschafft>	 the integer one references digits specifically.
[13:08:07] <wikidasher>	 Ok, I'll leave it alone then
[13:08:09] <wikidasher>	 :)
[13:08:11] <wikidasher>	 thanks, phschafft 
[13:08:30] <phschafft>	 for example with some types you can overflow from finite into infinate. which you cannot with a fixed number of digits.
[13:09:07] <phschafft>	 I would say that the situation can be improved. but I at least see a difference. :)