[08:30:18] <godog>	 taavi: o/ re: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/dns/+/1307339 is there a specific issue or concern re: cname vs address ?
[08:30:44] <godog>	 I'm not opposed btw, I'd like to understand before breaking (again!) symmetry
[08:34:10] <taavi>	 godog: well I guess it's not happening for a while with these hardware prices, but I'm just thinking that even if we some day start serving dumps from codfw or some other DC, we wouldn't want to move the filesystem mounts around sites the same way we would http traffic for example
[08:35:17] <godog>	 true yeah, I too doubt something like that is going to happen anytime soon
[10:46:12] <topranks>	 guys I'm processing an access request to 'wmcs-roots' for Thibaut Le Page 
[10:46:31] <topranks>	 the puppet repo says Mark is the one who needs to approve that is that right?  I guess makes sense 
[10:48:02] <taavi>	 topranks: ihmo that should probably be b.liviero these days
[10:48:24] <taavi>	 that would be equivalent to what it was before https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/1175920, which I guess just needed someone
[10:48:43] <topranks>	 taavi: yeah I was wondering, I think that makes sense too 
[10:49:20] <taavi>	 although I have no idea what the process to update the approval rules is :P
[10:49:26] <topranks>	 I'll double-check with Mark to be sure, if he agrees I'll update the "approver" for the group in Puppet and tag Belinda on the task 
[10:49:47] <taavi>	 sgtm
[11:53:58] <taavi>	 did something just happen on tools-haproxy-8?
[12:14:05] <moritzm>	 topranks: that makes sense wrt approvers, when you reach out please also ask for the same to be implemented for the wmcs-admins groups