[12:50:27] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> I did some more tests, and as far as I can tell, Flask’s /static/ handler isn’t any slower than tools-static either (re @lucaswerkmeister: (my initial thought was that tools-static might have better cache behavior, but it looks like Flask’s static handler also suppor...)
[12:50:50] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> both in terms of delay (small file) and data transfer rate (large file)
[12:51:33] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> so I’ll just drop that idea for now, at the moment I can’t find any reason to use tools-static over Flask’s /static/ handler ^^
[12:51:57] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> (that’s not to say tools-static is useless, just that you don’t need it if you’re already running a Flask webservice)
[12:57:13] <wm-bot>	 !log tools.lucaswerkmeister-test <lucaswerkmeister> committed first test and then stopped webservice (test over)
[12:57:15] <stashbot>	 Logged the message at https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Nova_Resource:Tools.lucaswerkmeister-test/SAL
[20:17:35] <g2>	 Hello
[20:18:42] <g2>	 So I'm thinking about a cloud career but do not have a degree 
[20:19:28] <g2>	 And honestly not much experience with programming language but willing to learn
[20:19:52] <RhinosF1>	 This is for wikimedia cloud services support
[20:20:43] <g2>	 For clients?
[20:21:17] <g2>	 Oh I see
[20:22:15] <RhinosF1>	 I mean if you wanted a job with WMCS, I'm sure you can enquire here g2
[20:24:13] <RhinosF1>	 g2: https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/jobs/
[20:28:02] <g2>	 Thanks