[13:17:04] <arturo>	 !status network outage
[19:04:19] <wm-bb>	 <DiFronzo> Hello!
[19:04:20] <wm-bb>	 <DiFronzo> I’m considering using SQLite for an application on Toolforge as a replacement for a MariaDB database. However, I came across a guide on Wikitech that states:
[19:04:21] <wm-bb>	 <DiFronzo> “Using SQLite in production on Toolforge is discouraged due to NFS performance issues.”
[19:04:23] <wm-bb>	 <DiFronzo> Is this still the case?
[19:09:23] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> I expect so, yes
[19:10:17] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> it's possible to run some tools without NFS, but AFAIK that just means no persistent writable storage at all, so it's not useful for sqlite purposes
[19:11:59] <wm-bb>	 <DiFronzo> That makes sense—I suspected as much, but I wanted to confirm. I appreciate the clarification
[19:32:06] <bd808>	 @DiFronzo: out of curiosity have you had issues with ToolsDB that make it a poor fit for your tool or are you mostly looking to simplify things by removing an external dependency?
[19:37:52] <wm-bb>	 <DiFronzo> bd808: I’m just exploring different options, and simplifying things is definitely a key factor in considering the move. Reducing external dependencies would make the tool easier to maintain and deploy, but I’m also evaluating whether SQLite is a viable option given Toolforge’s limitations.