[05:54:21] I'm having connection issues with the phab-ban tool. Getting ERR_CONNECTION_CLOSED at the moment. [06:45:33] RhinosF1: it loaded for me, it was a bit slow the first time around though [06:46:00] (the main page at least) [06:48:13] dcaro: try click login with OAuth? [06:48:50] I just got [06:48:52] upstream connect error or disconnect/reset before headers. retried and the latest reset reason: connection timeout [06:48:54] yep, that timed out [06:50:05] we were having issues during the weekend, and we tweak the timeouts on haproxy, this might be an overreaction (we shortened them too much), looking [06:50:40] now it loaded quicly for me [06:50:44] *quickly [06:51:54] now on the way back from phabricator it timed out again [07:02:54] hmm.... does not seem to be one of the timeouts we tweaked though, it takes 25s to time out [07:05:48] hmm, it seems all the requests that fail go through the same tools-k8s-gateway node, that might be the issue [07:06:56] can you open a task? we'll follow up in a bit [07:08:46] * dcaro be back in a bit [07:21:40] Sure [07:23:02] dcaro: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T431967 [07:23:37] Thanks 👍 [08:19:07] bd808: re: what docs or UI features led me to believe that making a toolinfo record in Toolhub would be the way to create a new Toolforge tool [08:19:11] the docs are clear, if I had been following them at the time I’d have used toolsadmin as they specify... Instead I was already on toolhub (I think I had used it to look up another tool) and saw the "Add or remove tools" in the left bar, which opened the "create a new tool" form, and I just thought it was two different UIs in front of the same "create toolforge tool" API [08:20:00] I think I didn’t realize a tool is not necessarily a Toolforge tool? [08:20:24] yep, toolhub considers tools beyond toolforge, like in-wiki user scripts and such [08:20:31] (or hosted anywhere else too) [08:20:41] 👍 [08:21:10] ex. https://toolhub.wikimedia.org/tools/plwiki-msz2001-abusefilter-analyzer [08:23:12] thanks for sharing! great example of something that wouldn’t be useful on Toolforge [09:00:12] !log tools restart haproxy on haproxy-8 removing tune.disable-zero-copy-forwarding from config [09:00:16] Logged the message at https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Nova_Resource:Tools/SAL [14:56:42] Krinkle: The wikibugs post-merge failure is T425229. Istio doesn't like the HTTP response shape and turns it into an error. [14:56:42] T425229: istio-envoy enforcing strict RFC 7231 compliance for 204 status responses - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T425229 [14:57:10] * bd808 apparently forgot to actually fix that [15:00:13] thilp: thanks for that info. "Tool" being the most vague idea leads all kinds of interesting assumptions and corner cases. Naming is hard. :) [15:00:48] thilp: Also, welcome! [15:17:31] bd808: ack, good to know [15:17:43] it looks like it is reporting the new tasks now, so works as expected [15:31:50] Yeah, the thunk is received as needed to trigger the data refresh. The error happens on the ack that is sent back to the CI process. [18:13:51] (waves) who can I talk to about a password reset problem? My antique account is (probably?) pointed at an antique email address, so I’m not getting password reset emails. I emailed idm-help@ in April with no response. [18:38:23] Hi uLuisVilla - are you able to file a phabricator ticket (phabricator.wikimedia.org) with the details of your account / possible ancient email address / current email address info? [18:45:23] I can, probably (possible that my phab account is also dead in the same way). What category/tabs for phab? [19:01:13] lol, I had managed to forget why IRC doesn’t really work here in the year 2026. Anyway: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T432056 [19:01:24] thanks in advance to anyone who can help out!