[09:31:51] PROBLEM - MariaDB sustained replica lag on s8 on db2181 is CRITICAL: 351.4 ge 10 https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/MariaDB/troubleshooting%23Replication_lag https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/000000273/mysql?orgId=1&var-server=db2181&var-port=9104 [09:34:50] RECOVERY - MariaDB sustained replica lag on s8 on db2181 is OK: (C)10 ge (W)5 ge 0 https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/MariaDB/troubleshooting%23Replication_lag https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/000000273/mysql?orgId=1&var-server=db2181&var-port=9104 [10:55:03] marostegui: federico3: I have a schema change on old masters of codfw. T371742 is it free for me to do it? [10:55:03] T371742: Change page.page_links_updated to fixed-length timestamp in wmf wikis - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T371742 [10:55:27] and T370903 [10:55:27] T370903: Remove cuc_actiontext, cuc_only_for_read_old, and cuc_private from cu_changes on WMF wikis - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T370903 [11:02:13] Amir1: from my side good to go [11:06:06] Amir1: do we want to take the opportunity to test an updated version of schema change? [11:06:44] Amir1: if so I can update https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/repos/data_persistence/dbtools/auto_schema/-/merge_requests/7 shortly [11:06:44] ooh [11:06:49] sounds good to me [12:12:50] PROBLEM - MariaDB sustained replica lag on s8 on db2181 is CRITICAL: 710.8 ge 10 https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/MariaDB/troubleshooting%23Replication_lag https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/000000273/mysql?orgId=1&var-server=db2181&var-port=9104 [12:16:50] RECOVERY - MariaDB sustained replica lag on s8 on db2181 is OK: (C)10 ge (W)5 ge 0 https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/MariaDB/troubleshooting%23Replication_lag https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/000000273/mysql?orgId=1&var-server=db2181&var-port=9104 [13:42:08] shall we create a MariaDB or DBA subgroup on https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/repos/sre to keep things tidy? [13:47:37] there should be a data persistence somewhere? [13:47:58] ah, it's under repos directly https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/repos/data_persistence [14:06:07] Amir1: yes that's where Auto Schema lives but I don't know if we can reparent it under sre [15:04:00] federico3: sorry I was in meeting. I think it should be possible but releng would know better [15:04:44] the downside of moving repos around is that folk who've cloned it have to update their remotes (and any doc links) [15:39:08] Emperor: indeed, yet the repos under data_persistence are a handful so perhaps it's not too much work