[09:43:31] <jynus>	 taking care of T&S request
[10:16:50] <jynus>	 federico3: I would take your offer for a review here: https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/repos/sre/mediabackups/-/merge_requests/6
[10:18:14] <federico3>	 sure, I can do it
[10:18:55] <jynus>	 ^ marostegui this is why I wanted to take care of T&S requests myself, in this case, it will make automation work again
[10:21:06] <jynus>	 federico3: you can see it now does the correct output at ms-backup1001:/home/jynus/deletion-output.txt
[10:26:32] <jynus>	 thank you
[10:28:37] <jynus>	 context, because of k8s recent move of admin scripts, https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Media_storage/Backups#Batch_query,_recovery_and_deletion was broken
[10:28:58] <jynus>	 but it now works again (or as soon as I upgrade the package on all clients)
[12:08:03] <marostegui>	 thank you jynus !
[14:57:11] <andrewbogott>	 looks like 'mydumper' isn't present in debian trixie; is that something y'all have a plan for already?
[14:59:32] <jynus>	 I didn't knew
[15:00:24] <Emperor>	 ah, that's kindof my fault
[15:00:29] <Emperor>	 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000014
[15:00:30] <jynus>	 !
[15:01:14] <andrewbogott>	 it looks like it's been updated but no one has built the new version... I may be misreading though
[15:02:57] <andrewbogott>	 Emperor: want me to make you a phab task?
[15:06:15] <jynus>	 I don't know if we should support bleeding edge oses like Debian
[15:06:22] <Emperor>	 It was pulled when the obsolete pcre3 library got dropped from Debian 4 years after I filed the bug report
[15:06:49] <Emperor>	 subsequently 0.10.1-2 was updated to use pcre2, but not in time for it to make it into the trixie release
[15:07:22] <Emperor>	 (in fact, that upload was in September of this year)
[15:08:53] <jynus>	 I wonder why 0.10.1
[15:09:18] <Emperor>	 It probably makes sense to just re-build the version from testing (0.10.1-2) against trixie?
[15:09:30] <jynus>	 but upstream is v0.20.2-2
[15:09:55] <Emperor>	 jynus: see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099033#19
[15:10:11] <Emperor>	 looks like Otto intends to update the package, but has only recently started looking at it.
[15:11:15] <Emperor>	 someone could email Otto and tell him to hurry up. Ahem, offer support and encouragement whilst asking for a timescale ;-)
[15:11:50] <Emperor>	 andrewbogott: to be faire the "me" whose fault it might be is my Debian hat, not my WMF staff hat :)
[15:12:02] <andrewbogott>	 oops not the otto I was expecting
[15:12:30] <andrewbogott>	 Emperor: yep, you weren't wrong, and it /is/ getting the attention you wanted just late in the game
[15:12:41] * andrewbogott wonders what to do in the meantime
[15:14:11] <Emperor>	 andrewbogott: as I say, I'd expect 0.10.1-2 from testing would build fine against trixie (so you could presumably use wmf-debci to do that for you)
[15:15:41] <Emperor>	 (sorry, I'm kindof lost in a maze of thumbnail sizes all alike, so am a bit short of spare brain myself right now)
[16:29:52] <andrewbogott>	 Emperor: any reason I can't just copy over the existing .deb?  Do you anticipate it having weird dependencies that wouldn't work if I do that?
[16:30:46] <Emperor>	 andrewbogott: the existing .deb will be linked against libpcre3 of some stripe, which is no longer in Debian.
[16:31:42] <andrewbogott>	 oh! I reread the backscroll, now I understand :)
[16:31:42] <andrewbogott>	 I will get to building after lunch
[16:35:22] <Emperor>	 it _should_ be a fairly easy process to do with wmf-debci now :)
[16:47:23] <federico3>	 that's a big _should_
[16:57:26] <Emperor>	 No, it really should be - download package and rebuild for different suite is one of the easy-use-cases wmf-debci and associated docs are precisely for
[18:35:56] <andrewbogott>	 Emperor: the code that dgit checked out shows this as the latest patch:
[18:35:59] <andrewbogott>	 https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/uOkrcSUR/
[18:36:07] <andrewbogott>	 that makes me think that I am not getting what you expected me to get
[18:37:51] <Emperor>	 andrewbogott: err, if I do "dgit clone mydumper", I get...
[18:37:56] <Emperor>	 oh, I get a barfogram from phab.
[18:38:11] <Emperor>	 andrewbogott: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P84382
[18:38:17] <Emperor>	 (start of output from "git log")
[18:39:09] <andrewbogott>	 ah, the instructions say to do 'dgit clone mydumper <distro>'
[18:39:49] <andrewbogott>	 if I leave that off I seem to get the head
[18:40:32] <Emperor>	 OK, but you wanted the version from testing, right? "dgit clone mydumper testing" also gets me the same version
[18:41:39] <Emperor>	 [if you can think of how to make the docs clearer on this point, please LMK how and/or edit them :) ]
[18:50:25] <andrewbogott>	 I think they're clear, I just never used dgit before so didn't know what to expect
[18:59:34] <andrewbogott>	 Emperor: so to get this build onto an apt server I'm just scp'ing it myself, right? Or does the ci pipeline do that too?
[20:22:07] <andrewbogott>	 How much do y'all hate this?   https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/1199850/4
[20:22:16] <andrewbogott>	 (adding optional --skip-ssl to dbutils)
[20:22:54] <andrewbogott>	 Oh I guess no one uses that but us :)
[23:16:39] <Amir1>	 yeah, I was surprised even something like dbutils in puppet existed 
[23:16:48] <Amir1>	 never heard of it before