[08:34:28] 10GitLab (Infrastructure), 10serviceops: GitLab minor version upgrade: 14.9.x - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T304622 (10Jelto) @Arnoldokoth and I will do the upgrade of GitLab + Runners on Monday after 4pm UTC. [09:07:24] Hi all, we are wondering, assigning a merge request in gitlab is not available in our instance, is that because it's a paid feature? (see https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/-/issues/32943) [13:51:08] 10GitLab (Project Migration), 10Release-Engineering-Team (Done by Feb 23 🧟), 10User-brennen: Early adoption signup for WMF GitLab - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T282842 (10kostajh) >>! In T282842#7114542, @kostajh wrote: > @Tgr and I are interested to migrate https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/plugins/gitil... [16:31:32] dcaro_away: looks to me like assigning a single (1) reviewer should be included but multiple assignees is indeed a paid feature. But you say you cant even assign one? [16:35:44] yeah, that would be weird [16:56:39] assigning one worked, but when you can only pick one person to ping who do you pick? This feels like a really restrictive decision by upstream and yet another reason to feel salty about open core. [16:57:39] gitlab has certainly been concretizing my former vague distaste for the model into something more like pure hatred. [16:59:10] brennen: it seems container registries are disabled for repos, but it could be handy for some cases. What do you think? [17:03:59] bd808: you aren't the only one. was just reading comments on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/-/issues/32943 [17:04:25] "If possible, Gitlab should even have proper "Maker Checker Signer (MCS)" implemented" [17:05:32] arturo: acknowledging that it could be handy, we don't currently have a plan to enable it. i'm not automatically opposed or anything, but i think it's a bit out of scope for what we're currently trying to do. [17:06:43] ok [17:06:44] if you're interested in using it, a brief phab task to capture discussion would be welcome. :) [17:08:00] i haven't looked into this deeply, but assume it'd probably require thinking about a lot of extra storage, potential security concerns, etc. [17:08:58] oh, lots of storage... unless you allow/enable it on demand for certain repos/trees [20:19:43] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Security Team AppSec, 10Security-Team, 10SecTeam-Processed, 10Security: Merge templates that are part of initial release to production branch - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T303482 (10sbassett) [20:19:46] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Security Team AppSec, 10Security-Team, 10Security: Create initial proof of concept application security pipeline repository - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T289293 (10sbassett) [20:19:52] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Security Team AppSec, 10Security-Team, 10Security: Design and Build Application Security Pipeline Components for Gitlab - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T289290 (10sbassett) [20:20:13] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Security Team AppSec, 10Security-Team, 10SecTeam-Processed, 10Security: Research best ways to pass certain credentials to external services within application security-related ci templates - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T295508 (10sbassett) [20:20:19] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Security Team AppSec, 10Security-Team, 10Security: Create initial proof of concept application security pipeline repository - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T289293 (10sbassett) [20:20:25] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Security Team AppSec, 10Security-Team, 10Security: Design and Build Application Security Pipeline Components for Gitlab - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T289290 (10sbassett) [20:22:28] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Security Team AppSec, 10Security-Team, 10Security: Create initial proof of concept application security pipeline repository - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T289293 (10sbassett) [20:23:58] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Security Team AppSec, 10Security-Team, 10Security: Create initial proof of concept application security pipeline repository - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T289293 (10sbassett) [20:24:08] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Security Team AppSec, 10Security-Team, 10Security: Design and Build Application Security Pipeline Components for Gitlab - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T289290 (10sbassett) [20:25:28] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Release-Engineering-Team, 10Security Team AppSec, 10Security-Team, 10Security: Evaluate and confirm potential licensing issues for gitlab appsec pipeline tools - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T304737 (10sbassett) [20:44:15] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Release-Engineering-Team, 10Security Team AppSec, 10Security-Team, 10Security: Evaluate and confirm potential licensing issues for gitlab appsec pipeline tools - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T304737 (10sbassett) [20:51:34] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Release-Engineering-Team, 10Security Team AppSec, 10Security-Team, 10Security: Evaluate and confirm potential licensing issues for gitlab appsec pipeline tools - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T304737 (10sbassett) [20:53:52] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Release-Engineering-Team, 10Security Team AppSec, 10Security-Team, 10Security: Evaluate and confirm potential licensing issues for gitlab appsec pipeline tools - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T304737 (10sbassett)