[07:23:47] <jayme>	 anybody else received a mail from @gitlab.com with subject "Changes to your GitLab subscription | Wikimedia" containing an unsubscribe link that suggests you've landed on some mailing list of theirs?
[07:35:58] <jelto>	 I got that mail too. However I'm instance admin and subscribed to the releases newsletter.
[07:35:58] <jelto>	 But this message smells like unwanted sales mails. I'm happy to have more feedback from others. Sending this kind of mails to our users without consent is a no-go and highly confusing.
[08:49:32] <RhinosF1>	 I have an account on Wikimedia gitlab and haven't had anything
[08:51:32] <wikibugs>	 10GitLab (Infrastructure), 10serviceops, 10Patch-For-Review: bring new gitlab hardware servers into production - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T307142 (10Jelto) >>! In T307142#7976964, @Jelto wrote: > ... > I'll check bacula tomorrow for new backups of `gitlab1004` and make sure the replicas synced prope...
[08:52:02] <wikibugs>	 10GitLab (Infrastructure), 10serviceops, 10Patch-For-Review: bring new gitlab hardware servers into production - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T307142 (10Jelto)
[15:07:28] <wikibugs>	 10GitLab (Infrastructure), 10Data-Persistence-Backup, 10serviceops, 10Patch-For-Review, 10User-brennen: Backups for GitLab - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T274463 (10Jelto) After migrating to new hosts (T307142) we got a bacula alert about backups on `gitlab1001` (the old production machine):  ` PROB...
[15:12:51] <wikibugs>	 10GitLab (Infrastructure), 10serviceops, 10Patch-For-Review: bring new gitlab hardware servers into production - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T307142 (10Jelto) >>! In T307142#7978386, @Jelto wrote: > ... > One rsync job failed on the old production host `gitlab1001`. I'll take a closer look. I assume th...
[15:30:41] <wikibugs>	 10GitLab (Infrastructure), 10Data-Persistence-Backup, 10serviceops, 10Patch-For-Review, 10User-brennen: Backups for GitLab - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T274463 (10jcrespo) Bacula is now happy: `Fresh: 116 jobs`  Note on first setup, the backup check is quite sensitive, so anything that is not a su...
[16:18:57] <brennen>	 jayme, jelto: it's definitely salespam.  i'm taking a call with them next week, mostly to tell them to knock it off.
[16:20:05] <jelto>	 brennen: thanks a lot!
[16:21:02] <jayme>	 brennen: maybe try to figure out where they got the mail adress from (like if there is some kind of telemetry involved)
[16:21:24] <brennen>	 i don't know whether they'll listen.  full-time sales drones have a way of being relentless about this kind of thing.
[16:21:35] <brennen>	 there had extremely better not be telemetry involved.
[17:05:00] <dancy>	 Dez
[18:14:46] <mutante>	 :(
[18:15:04] <mutante>	 I merged a change that did nothing but change the time to keep backups
[18:15:13] <mutante>	 that triggered a gitlab reconfig
[18:15:17] <mutante>	 and now it's down :(
[18:15:52] <mutante>	 ah.. but it's back now :)
[18:16:24] <mutante>	 well. it was https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/802622  causing an "Exec[Reconfigure GitLab]"
[18:16:45] <mutante>	 seems ok now though. no worries then
[19:19:03] <dancy>	 whew!
[19:21:25] <brennen>	 restarts take quite a while
[19:37:15] <brennen>	 (usually just about long enough to think "i wonder if this is going to come back up")
[19:40:52] <mutante>	 haha, yea, that was _exactly_ the time frame. just long enough to start worrying
[19:41:09] <mutante>	 but then ok shortly after a few reloads