[10:16:04] 10GitLab: Forking a public project without selecting a visibility level fails - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T323361 (10Clement_Goubert) [13:27:21] Silly question to which the answer is I expect no, but: if I want to group a bunch of personal repos together, is there any way to do so? e.g. https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/mvernon/foo/bar and https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/mvernon/foo/baz and so on? [14:58:04] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Application Security Reviews, 10secscrum, 10serviceops, and 2 others: Security Readiness Reviews of Trusted GitLab Runners - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T304514 (10sbassett) [14:58:10] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Application Security Reviews, 10secscrum, 10serviceops, and 2 others: Security Readiness Reviews of Trusted GitLab Runners - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T304514 (10sbassett) [15:57:39] Emperor: You can _name_ personal repos that way (with slashes to make them appear to be grouped) but that doesn't put them into a group (in the GitLab sense) [15:58:07] Hm, I thought I'd tried that and been told it was an invalid name [15:59:27] hmm. lemme try [15:59:56] ah indeed. It allowed me to type it in but I didn't try pressing the create button before. [16:00:49] That's too bad. Sorry for the incorrect info. [16:07:00] NP [16:53:42] 10GitLab (CI & Job Runners), 10Release-Engineering-Team (GitLab III: GitLab in LA 🪃): Try Reggie for buildkit caching - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T323149 (10dancy) [18:19:16] 10GitLab (Misc): Forking a public project without selecting a visibility level fails - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T323361 (10brennen) [18:19:28] 10GitLab (Misc), 10Upstream: Forking a public project without selecting a visibility level fails - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T323361 (10brennen) [18:20:31] 10GitLab (Misc), 10Upstream: Forking a public project without selecting a visibility level fails - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T323361 (10brennen) Without digging too much, this sounds likely to be an upstream usability issue.