[16:58:05] <bd808>	 taavi: it is possible that I did break the gitlab hooks with https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/repos/releng/gitlab-webhooks/-/merge_requests/28. I will open a bug report and investigate.
[17:01:09] <wikibugs>	 10GitLab (Integrations): Is the Phabricator webhook sink broken? - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T363114 (10bd808) 03NEW
[17:02:05] <wikibugs>	 10GitLab (Integrations): Is the Phabricator webhook sink broken? - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T363114#9733483 (10bd808) p:05Triage→03High a:03bd808
[17:15:53] <wikibugs>	 10GitLab (Integrations): Is the Phabricator webhook sink broken? - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T363114#9733499 (10bd808) I can assert that webhook inputs were received by the running tool for both https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/repos/ci-tools/banana-checker/-/merge_requests/10 and https://gitlab.wikimedia.or...
[18:18:48] <brennen>	 i'm off today, but a passing thought: i wonder if it would be a good idea to post a comment on gitlab back to gitlab itself when updating a referenced task on phabricator.
[18:18:54] <brennen>	 might be more noise than it's worth, i guess.
[18:19:08] <brennen>	 (and of course one more thing to break.)