[12:34:44] 10GitLab: [[User:xxx]] shows as "[censuré]" in README when rendered - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T367635 (10Poslovitch) 03NEW [14:09:15] 10GitLab: [[User:xxx]] shows as "[redacted]" in README.md when rendered - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T367635#9895526 (10Aklapper) [14:11:35] 10GitLab (Upstream pit of despair 🕳️): [[User:xxx]] shows as "[redacted]" in README.md when rendered - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T367635#9895527 (10Aklapper) [14:13:53] 10GitLab (Upstream pit of despair 🕳️): [[User:xxx]] shows as "[redacted]" in README.md when rendered - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T367635#9895528 (10Aklapper) > Why is it like so? That is a question for upstream developers - probably some "feature"... [14:42:18] 10GitLab (Upstream pit of despair 🕳️), 07Upstream: GitLab truncates commit messages over 1k of text - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330790#9895580 (10LucasWerkmeister) 05Resolved→03Open Still seems to be happening here: https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/toolforge-repos/wd-image-positions/-/commit/0e0deb1a4... [17:16:59] 10GitLab (Upstream pit of despair 🕳️): [[User:xxx]] shows as "[redacted]" in README.md when rendered - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T367635#9895688 (10Legoktm) According to https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/markdown.html#gitlab-specific-references, using double bracket syntax in a markdown file is supposed to... [18:06:13] hm, a MR can't have multiple reviewers? [20:12:33] 10GitLab (Upstream pit of despair 🕳️): [[User:xxx]] shows as "[redacted]" in README.md when rendered - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T367635#9895754 (10Aklapper) 05Open→03Declined Thanks for looking that up - makes sense. Declining as this is upstream behavior that we do not plan to fix or circumvent... [20:29:16] legoktm: it can, in the paid version of gitlab [20:29:18] see T365350 [20:29:18] T365350: Implement a bot which subscribes/mentions multiple reviewers for merge requests - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T365350 [20:30:20] uck :/ thanks for the pointer