[02:30:14] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Abdul> Thanks alot for looking at. It turns out a trailing comma was causing this issue 😐
[02:30:14] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Abdul> Regardless thanks for clarifying what parameters are not required as it was not clear to me (re @gtisza: The code looks fine at a glance (author/client_id/client_secret are not valid parameters but should not do any harm either). In theory an invalid token should result in a different error.)
[09:11:59] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <amire80> Dark corners of Wikimedia instances of MediaWiki...
[09:13:17] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <amire80> Good: Cologne Blue is not listed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-rendering
[09:13:17] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <amire80> Bad: Cologne Blue is listed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Version
[09:14:01] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <amire80> Same for "Modern".
[09:23:54] <RhinosF1>	 Are they in $wgSkipSkins
[13:09:16] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <lucaswerkmeister> I’m looking a bit into OAuth 2.0… do I understand this correctly that unlike in OAuth 1.0a, the request data isn’t signed anymore?
[13:09:42] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <lucaswerkmeister> you just send a constant (per user) Authorization: header, and everything else is the responsibility of TLS?
[14:50:01] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <gtisza> yes
[14:54:15] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <lucaswerkmeister> thanks!
[17:32:06] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> Some people still use it (re @amire80: Good: Cologne Blue is not listed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-rendering
[17:32:07] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> Bad: Cologne Blue is listed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Version)
[17:32:36] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> Also I don't see what is good in them not being listed :)
[17:33:06] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <amire80> More code to maintain. This has a cost.
[17:34:07] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <amire80> It's perhaps unlikely, but still conceivable that some Cologne Blue code breaks the site, which will already be bad, and someone will also have to work on fixing it instead of fixing a thing that more people use.
[17:36:01] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> Well I guess that is the problem with those skins that they are not just CSS (or Less/SCSS), which is very weird though (re @amire80: More code to maintain. This has a cost.)
[17:36:30] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Thecladis> Are new ones better in this regard or they also each adds some custom code?
[17:37:33] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <amire80> I haven't looked in the code very much in the last three years or so, except language and keyboard configuration files, so I can't tell :(
[21:32:43] <legoktm[m]>	 IMO the legacy skins are very low on the list of legacy and unmaintained code that should be undeployed