[13:26:57] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> Sorry, for bothering again about API misunderstandings, but any idea why continue explodes on me?
[13:26:58] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=logevents&letype=upload&lelimit=500&leuser=Marek%20kleciak&format=json
[13:27:00] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> returns
[13:27:01] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> {
[13:27:03] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> "batchcomplete":"",
[13:27:04] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> "continue": {"lecontinue":"20120413135926|87083","continue":"-||"}
[13:27:06] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> (...)
[13:27:19] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> So I try to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=logevents&letype=upload&lelimit=500&leuser=Marek%20kleciak&format=json&continue=20120413135926|87083
[13:27:33] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> Which gets me "Invalid continue param. You should pass the original value returned by the previous query."
[13:27:43] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> any idea what is going wrong?
[13:28:51] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <jhsoby> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=logevents&letype=upload&lelimit=500&leuser=Marek%20kleciak&format=json&lecontinue=20120413135926|87083
[13:30:05] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <jhsoby> you used &continue= instead of &lecontinue=
[13:30:50] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> ouch
[13:31:01] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> Thanks so much!
[13:31:13] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <jhsoby> np :)
[13:37:19] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> In very related news, OSM Wiki is down to 21 424 files known to not have any license info whatsoever.
[13:37:56] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <jhsoby> how many were there at the start? (re @matkoniecz: In very related news, OSM Wiki is down to 21 424 files known to not have any license info whatsoever.)
[13:38:32] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> around 23 000, 2021-12-29 had 22 034
[13:39:21] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> decrease is mostly from ones where {{PD-shape}} is OK or are from known source on a reliable license (screenshots of OSM default map and so on)
[13:39:32] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <jhsoby> nice
[13:39:38] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> Some authors already responded to notifications
[13:41:26] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <matkoniecz> But sadly it is about decade overdue and some are no longer active :(
[16:35:47] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <DennisPriskorn> cached sparql data? (re @Nikki: my guess would be that your code is using its cached data)
[17:45:17] <wm-bb>	 [telegram] <Nikki> your program's cached data. you changed your function to search p219 instead of p220, and I'm guessing you didn't clear the cached data and it's still returning the cached data from searching p220 (re @DennisPriskorn: cached sparql data?)