[06:33:36] I use etherpad.wikimedia.org a lot, and love it. I was wondering who maintains our Etherpad instance, and if it would make sense to upgrade it to a more recent version? Newer Etherpad versions support inline images, headers, comments, suggestions - going more in the direction of a (lightweight) Google Docs experience. Here's a test instance hosted by others that you can play with [06:33:36] https://board.net/p/testboard3 [06:33:56] I would totally understand if there are good reasons not to do this, not enough resources, etc. Just neutrally asking! [06:34:45] I'll be happy to submit a Phabricator ticket requesting an update. I wanted to check here first if it makes sense at all, if there are major objections or things to know [06:36:49] @trnstlntk: filing a phabricator ticket sounds like a good first step. Even if the upgrade isn't something that's feasible right now for whatever reason, it would be good to track it as something to do eventually [06:43:00] Voici le ticket: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T316421 (re @wmtelegram_bot: @trnstlntk: filing a phabricator ticket sounds like a good first step. Even if the upgrade isn't something that's feas...) [06:43:47] Earlier Etherpad tickets seem to date back to 2017, that didn't make me very confident that this will be seen 😉 [06:44:32] This one still looks pretty relevant...! https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T136744 (Yes yes, I'll comment there) [06:46:16] we last upgraded etherpad in February per https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T300568#7675998 [06:51:10] I cc'd some more people and added the SRE project [06:52:33] Yeah, I do recall that upgrade, and was wondering why we didn't then include the richer features I mention. I can imagine there may be good reasons! [06:52:43] Thanks! [19:57:20] I wonder if we can also have an older instance in parallel. I liked the before-update version a lot more. It was neater and more lightweight. It is indeed that now it looks more like Google Docs 😅