[16:50:50] Hey hive mind - do we have a wiki tool that shows all of a user's edits to a particular wiki page? I don't recall one off the top of my head, but I am old and forgetful these days :) [16:52:03] https://sigma.toolforge.org/usersearch.py?name=Pharos&page=Main_Page&server=enwiki&max= (re @fuzheado: Hey hive mind - do we have a wiki tool that shows all of a user's edits to a particular wiki page? I don't recall one off the to...) [16:53:01] linked from the top of [[special:history]] at least on enwiki. "Find edits by user" [16:56:28] Thanks much! Yet another case of hiding in plain sight! : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/a88c612d/file_39142.jpg [16:56:49] Sadly, neither the Toolhub directory or Hay's directory are helpful in finding this tool! [17:02:38] often special:history or special:contributions are my first place to look for a tool. I can't remember last time I tried the directory [17:02:48] I suppose that is a general weakness of tools that have sub-tooling [17:03:54] For example, how would the tools directory capture all this for sigma.toolforge.org - : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/e6fdea95/file_39143.jpg [17:09:45] I don't think anything prevents registering each subtool separately. [17:18:05] It would be interesting to see how often someone does take the time to document each subtool for discoverability like this. (re @gtisza: I don't think anything prevents registering each subtool separately.) [17:18:38] This would be a great Hackathon task for non-coders! [17:18:45] I think the xtools subtools have separate entries, and the various pageview-related tools too. [17:19:11] Yes, Xtools does it particularly well (re @gtisza: I think the xtools subtools have separate entries, and the various pageview-related tools too.) [17:19:36] In fact in nearly every search, some type of Xtools tool pops up :) [17:21:37] I don't suppose "reactions" translate to bridges