[10:45:35] I think most Wikimedia votes are actually !votes. "not votes" (re @waldyrious: I don't have any plans, really, just curious since community votes have been central to the Wikimedia movement since very early,...) [10:49:03] Right. Still, quickly grasping the level of support of a proposal is clearly something we've collectively deemed useful, as we have formatting standards and even icons to help with that. In this sense, the fact that the extension requires a comment for negative votes to be cast is a nod to that principle. (re @jeremy_b: I think most Wikimedia votes are actually !votes. "not votes") [10:49:32] I am however wondering how the extension handles threaded discussions under votes. I shall ask the author about that. [11:33:18] I remember there is a vote script for Community Wishlist Survey. [12:34:48] It would be nice to see this widely used to collect WMF chapter metrics, Google forms is an insecure way to collect [12:50:55] What metrics are collected in google forms? (re @Wilfredo Rafael: It would be nice to see this widely used to collect WMF chapter metrics, Google forms is an insecure way to collect) [13:03:50] Hi, everybody:) [14:06:57] @flashbitcointools [14:06:57] [14:06:59] Btc Flash Coins [14:07:00] Crypto Loading [14:07:02] Scripts ,Blockchain [14:07:03] @flashbitcointools [14:07:07] @flashbitcointools [14:07:08] [14:07:09] Btc Flash Coins [14:07:11] Crypto Loading [14:07:12] Scripts ,Blockchain [14:07:14] @flashbitcointools [15:26:22] Random query - has anyone looked into using Apache NiFi in the Wikimedia environment? It seems like a pretty nifty tool for low-code data processing pipelines, for example working with Wikidata/SPARQL - https://nifi.apache.org/ [15:26:47] @Susannaanas This is perhaps an interesting tool to bridge the coding chasm, as we have often discussed [15:29:27] I will check, we need to tackle that! [15:30:22] Yeah, we haven't had a lot of activity in this area lately, but I'd like to revisit it. I only ran across NiFi recently, and it seems like it could be useful (re @Susannaanas: I will check, we need to tackle that!) [15:34:05] Had a look, I like that! I made an interactive installation back in 1994 with Max. It looks a bit like that! (I am also involved in a media archaeology project which made me make that remark) [15:38:22] I would be willing to test it, but I would like to do it together in order to limit the cognitive load (old already) 😃 (re @fuzheado: Yeah, we haven't had a lot of activity in this area lately, but I'd like to revisit it. I only ran across NiFi recently, and it ...) [16:48:33] It depends but generally gender, username are asked (re @Jan_ainali: What metrics are collected in google forms?) [16:51:48] Are WMF asking chapters to fill this in? And for who then? Or what did you mean with "collect WMF chapter metrics"? (re @Wilfredo Rafael: It depends but generally gender, username are asked) [16:54:34] It was done in the past, right now the only metric that I know is just the number of pictures uploaded [16:56:13] I thought reporting was being done through the [[Wikimedia Affiliates Data Portal]] nowadays and not in Google forms... [16:57:35] /delete [16:57:52] I thought reporting was being done through the [[m:Wikimedia Affiliates Data Portal]] nowadays and not in Google forms... [18:46:34] @lucaswerkmeister some people just dislike dynamically typed languages ... and I think static typing also makes more sense from a security perspective